Jesus In Islam

[Anyabwile]

No, I don't agree.

No no no, hold on a minute, you <b>do</b> agree, this is simple and plain fact. Because it's seen you agree that the bible is a <i>departure from the original or from what is pure or correct</i> in your response to me, one section of which i plucked out and highlighted. So you do agree. The only disagreement we have in this respect is if 1) you have a different definition of the word Corrupt than i (And the marriam webster dictionary) Or 2) you wish to change what you originally said in your response to me. Which is fine, we all change our minds. But if we're discounting those two factors, you have agreed with me that the bible is a <i>departure from the original or from what is pure or correct</i> in your previous response. This is plain and simple for <b>everyone </b>who reads this topic to see. Perhaps you should have thought a bit more about what you was writing in your response to me fine, but going by your response, you do agree the bible is corrupt. We've established i'm not talking about translations, although holding on to this one would be your escape route out of this, so i wouldn't be suprised if we go back to it, but you do agree with me if i'm to go by your previous response. The only reason you'd want to end this discussion is because you've ended up agreeing with my in your response. But i don't mind carrying on with this...we'll get there in the end.