check this link for vast islamic information and multimedia files


islamic multimedia

as Salam Alykom


Just check this:


http://www.algomhuria.net.eg/gazette/1/2.asp

http://www.1924.org/comment/index.php?id=1333_0_13_0_M#


Darfur crisis the result of years of US sponsored terrorism in Southern Sudan


July 26, 2004 www.1924.org


The situation in the Darfur region of Sudan has become the new focus of the western world, with reports of an estimated one million people being displaced and ten thousand being killed. There has been pressure largely driven by the international community, and America in particular, to act in order to prevent a catastrophe. US House Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California recently stated, "We must act now to avoid more slaughter and avoid a repetition of the genocide in Rwanda 10 years ago. This is a crisis, an emergency. We have the legal obligation under international law to act.”


Donald Payne, Democratic representative from New Jersey, told a press conference, "We urge the Secretary of State, Colin Powell to support an immediate intervention to stop the killing. If we fail to act a million people could die before the end of the year.”


The Americans have laid the blame for the events in the Darfur squarely at the doorstep of the Sudanese government, whom it claims are sponsoring militias known as the ‘Janjaweed’ to rampage and kill people. President Bush recently stated,


"They [sudanese government] must stop Janjaweed violence, they must provide access to humanitarian relief for the people who suffer," he said in a speech in Washington.


Such an outcry from the US and western governments would seem to imply that the situation in Sudan was its own making and not through outside interference. However the situation is far from that, and the Americans have been actively stoking the flames for many years. A brief examination of Sudan shows that the South of the country has much of the natural resources and this is where the US has been trying to secure its influence, and has used a number of policies to achieve these aims.


The Americans have for many years actively funded a terrorist rebel militia, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA), to fight against the Sudanese government and also to spread disenchantment in the South against the Northern government. This group has been committed untold atrocities throughout Sudan both against government troops as well as civilians, Muslim and Christian. It was under President Clinton that these terrorist militias were given the financial backing to rise up against the Sudanese governments and this policy has been maintained by the Bush administration.


In October 1999 Madeline Albright the then Secretary of State met with the terrorist leader of the SPLA, John Garang. When Madeline Albright met Garang she extended the hand of American friendship and committed to providing huge amounts of “humanitarian aid”. This charitable venture was a means to channel vast quantities of money towards the terrorist cause of the SPLA, which at that point had a flagging military fund.


The Economist magazine described the SPLA as “little more than an armed gang of Dinkas… killing, looting and raping. Its indifference, almost animosity, towards the people it was supposed to be ‘liberating’ was all too clear.” [The Economist, March 1998]


The Sunday Times revealed that the Clinton administration was supporting the terrorist SPLA in order to “… destabilize the government of Sudan... More than $20m of military equipment, including radios, uniforms and tents will be shipped to Eritrea, Ethiopia and Uganda in the next few weeks. Although the equipment is earmarked for the armed forces of those countries, much of it will be passed on to the SPLA, which is preparing an offensive against the government in Khartoum.” [The Sunday Times, 17th November 1996].


Such blatant support and funding by America for a terrorist movement was completely ignored by the western governments, even though it was being reported widely. The SPLA were freely waging tyranny by destroying mosques, tearing up of copies of the Qur’an as they did in Tawreet and targeting the centres for the memorization of the Noble Qur’an in Hamshkureeb. They organised the bombing of Muslims during Fajr prayer and chose the 27th Rajab, the day of Israa and Mi’raj, as the time of heightened aggression.


Yet amidst all this butchery and oppression, they constantly repeat the mantra that they are being oppressed due to the application of the laws of Islam, even though it is clear that such laws are not applied. They have declared that they will continue to fight until the Sudanese government abolishes the Islamic laws. All of this confirms the extent of their hidden hatred and their blatant hostility towards Islam and the Muslims. It also confirms these terrorist rebels are working in a crusader war against Islam, not only to kill Muslims but also to prevent the application of Islam.


The Americans have sponsored this terrorist movement in order to separate Sudan into two separate entities, the North and South, along ethnic and religious lines. This colonialist plan of divide and conquer has been a recurring style used by the western colonialists to facilitate their hegemony over the Muslim world. This policy has been used for many hundreds of years, and was a means to destroy the Islamic Khilafah through the funding and supporting of autonomous entities within the state, that were encouraged to rebel and separate. An example of this was the rebellion of ibn Saud with the help of the British, which led to the establishment of the Saudi regime in the land that was known as Hijaz – a wilayah of the Islamic Khilafah. More recent examples show the creation of Kashmir as a conflict zone, and the recent and ongoing attempts to carve up Iraq into three states; Sunni, Shia and Kurd. Such political manoeuvres have resulted in more than fifty ineffective entities in the Muslim world, where previously only one had existed.


The sponsorship of terrorists is actually quite a normal state of affairs for the American regime. They were able to hire a terrorist militia in the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, which were used to fight and remove the Taliban. This occurred despite the wide spread atrocities being committed by the Northern Alliance.


The Guardian backed up this analogy by comparing the events in Sudan with US actions in South America,


“Welcome to the 1980s. Long live Ronald Reagan. Remember the scenario - a rebel group being trained and armed by the CIA to topple a sovereign government, cross-border incursions from secluded camps, and the whole de-stabilization exercise backed by international sanctions and a massive propaganda campaign. It sounds like Nicaragua or Angola circa 1984. In fact it’s Sudan 1998.” [The Guardian, 1 May 1998]


However, the government in Sudan is not without blame, rather, they have been complicit in the plans of the Americans. They have taken political actions which have led to the SPLA being granted political weight and clout, and have also agreed plans that would see Sudan split into two. The Sudanese governments oppression in Darfur, which they continue even today, is giving licence and credibility for international intervention. With such international focus growing, it will only be a matter of time when foreign troops move in, and Sudan is formally split into two.


Such is the complicated and devious nature of the America’s political games. They stoke the fires of death and destruction, often when the enemy is no more than a puppet, in order to bring about a climate for political change, which they then fashion by their own hands under the guise of ‘humanitarian intervention’.


The time has come for the Muslims to realize the true aims of the western world and the puppet regimes that preside over the Muslims on behalf of the West. The Muslim world must act to prevent its lands from being split ever further into oblivion, to the point that it poses no threat or resistance to any force on earth. The Muslims must realise that the secular political institutions that have been forced upon the Muslim lands, work only to serve the western aims. It is by calling for the implementation of the Islamic political system, and through Islamic politics, that Muslims have a future that will lead to the undoing of the ‘divide and conquer’ policies of the West.


The Prophet Muhammed (saw) indicated the importance and obligation of maintaining political unity in the Islamic world,


مَنْ أتاكم وأمرُكُم جميعٌ على رجل واحد يريد أن يشقّ عصاكم،أو يُفرّق جماعتكم فاقتلوه


“Whoever comes to you, while your affairs are united under one man, and wishes to break your unity then kill him.”


The Muslim world can only have a voice and a future by uniting under one Islamic political system, the Islamic Khilafah.

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/article.php?id=3013


WASHINGTON: The US media has surprisingly failed to pick up the shocking disclosure by Sydney Morning Herald, Australia’s leading newspaper, that the Irqai Prime Minister Iyad Allawi personally executed six suspected insurgents in a Baghdad police station.


The story by award-winning Australian journalist Paul McGeough said that the prisoners were handcuffed and blindfolded, lined up against a courtyard wall and shot by the Iraqi PM. Dr Allawi is alleged to have told those around him that he wanted to send a clear message to the police on how to deal with insurgents. Two people allege they witnessed the killings and there are also claims the Iraqi interior minister and four American men were present.


An Australian television channel interviewed the reporter who is in Iraq telling him that the Allawi family had denied the story. He replied, “Well it’s a very contentious issue. What you have is two very solid eyewitness accounts. Each witness is not aware that the other spoke.”


The Australian journalist said, “Well, I’ll take you through what the two witnesses said to give you the full chronology as I understand it. There was a surprise visit at about 10:30am to the police centre. The PM talked to policemen and then toured the complex. They came to a courtyard where six, sorry seven prisoners were lined up against a wall. They were blindfolded, they were described to me as an Iraqi colloquialism for the fundamentalist foreign fighters who came to Baghdad. They have that classic look that you see with many of the Osama Bin Laden associates of the scraggly beard and the very short hair and they were a sort of ... took place in front of them as they were up against this wall was an exchange between the interior minister and Dr Allawi, saying that he felt like killing them on the spot.


The interior minister expressed the wish that he would like to kill all these men on the spot. The PM is said to have responded that they deserved worse than death. At that point, he is said to have pulled a gun and proceeded to aim at and shoot all seven. Six of them died, the seventh, according to one witness, was wounded in the chest. On the incident date, the correspondent said, “It happened on or around the weekend of June 19/20 — three weeks after Dr Allawi was named PM and one week before the handover.”


By Khalid Hasan

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/article.php?id=2977


In the name of God, Most Merciful, Most Gracious!


Praise Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, peace and blessing be to our Prophet Muhammad, his family and all of his disciples.


Indeed, Allah created people so that He could be worshipped alone, so no companions are ascribed to Him, and He permitted Jihad on His Straight Way, so that the Religion of Allah could be above all, so that all areas of life could be guided by Islam, and so that the Earth could be cleansed of unbelief.


Allah said, «Make war on them until no more temptation remains…» (Anfal 39)


The reason why the Muslims are weak is because they abandoned the Jihad. Allah set the infidels on Muslims, these infidels are guided by ignorance and unbelief and in the Muslim countries they have tried to do everything to make Muslims forget their Religion. Enemies are taking the riches of Muslims, they are persecuting the Muslims and thus confirming the warning from Allah:


«They will not cease to fight with ye until they avert ye from your Religion, if they will be able to do it».


And this is what Russian infidels are doing on Islamic land of Ingushetia and in other Muslim countries today, when they are committing their gravest crimes.


Russian troops along with Ossetian formations were taking part in seizing Ingushetian territories and in expelling Ingushetians from their homes. Thousands of Ingushetian Muslims were killed and hundreds were missing. Many were maimed and humiliated.


Murders of Ingushetian men and kidnappings of ordinary Muslim men and women are continuing to this day. Ingushetia has turned into a den of gangs and tyranny.


Government of Russia has been conducting policies of imperial colonization by setting the occupied nations against one another. Every time Muslims demand independence, Russia attacks them by using the army of apostates, who are fighting on the side of the infidels against their fellow people, against the Muslims who desire freedom and independence. The situation in Chechnya and Ingushetia is an example thereof.


But times are changing. Signs of defeat of Russian invaders and their henchmen from among the apostates are already showing. Weakness in domestic and foreign policies, collapsing economy, desertion in the army, failure of the reforms, administrative anarchy, lack of security, drug trafficking, AIDS, elimination of social morals compared to the strengthening of Mujahideen and orderliness in organization of combat operations speaks about changes and the future victory coming soon.


False ideologies are collapsing, nations all around the world (including in Russia) are focusing their eyes on Islam as the only source of true justice, law and safety from tyranny, abomination and ignorance.


Military Council Majlis Al-Shura of Ingushetia is hereby making the following statement:


Having military training and military force, resorting to resources necessary to conduct Jihad on the Way of Allah, Military Council Majlis al-Shura of Ingushetia is declaring Jihad all across Ingushetia, with the goal to drive the invaders out of the Ingushetian land, to liberate the seized territories, to protect honor and dignity of Muslims, and to establish the Islamic State on the land of Ingushetia.


Military Council Majlis al-Shura of Ingushetia is declaring that Jihad is a direct responsibility (Fard Ayn) for each Muslim, an adult person and a person of sound judgment, citizen of Ingushetia, until the Ingushetian land is cleansed of the invasion, unbelief and injustice.


All Islamic scholars (Alims) are unanimous in the opinion that Jihad is mandatory for all, since the infidels invaded the Muslim land.


Allah imposes as a duty on each Muslim to conduct Jihad with their souls, with their property and their riches, with their knowledge and their word, to assist and support the Mujahideen in all actions against the infidels.


With the help of Allah we will restore justice, we will return what is rightfully ours and we will restore the right of the owners to their land (including Prigorodny District), where the enemy shed lots of Muslim blood.


Indeed, our mission is law and justice.


Everyone who cooperates with the invaders and helps them in the war against Muslims with weapons or with snitching thus becomes one of them. Requirement of the Shariah Law applies to such people. These people will be punished by death, because fighting shoulder to shoulder with infidels or helping the infidels in the war against Muslims banishes them from Islam. For Allah said that those who make friends among infidels become one of them. And Allah will not be guiding the wicked.


Muslims must be convinced that the only salvation and the only way to obtain honor and dignity is the Religion of Islam. Our enemies know it and this is why they are trying to do all they can to lead Muslims astray. They appoint their lackeys as muftis, imams of mosques, who in turn pervert the truth and lead Muslims away from the Religion of Islam; they spread ignorance and heresy; they split Muslims into groups and sects; they spread polytheism and they call to obey the enemies.


Muslims, do believe the promises of Allah about His help. Jihad on the Way of Allah is the truth that restores justice.


Allah is our Master and there is no help other than from Him.


Allah Akbar!!!


God is Great!!!


Military Council Majlis Al-Shura of Ingushetia


Department of Correspondence,


Kavkaz-Center


2004-07-09 00:35:03


print version | send to email

SALAAMUN TO ALL


Please forgive the length of this post, but given the nature of the topic, I felt is necessary to be as thorough as possible, insha-Allah.


I like to preface new threads with the following statements, ayats and definitions:


39.3 Now, surely, sincere obedience is due to Allah (alone) and (as for) those who take guardians besides Him, (saying), We do not serve them save that they may make us nearer to Allah, surely Allah will judge between them in that in which they differ; surely Allah does not guide him aright who is a liar, ungrateful.


39.45 And when Allah alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the hereafter shrink, and when those besides Him are mentioned, lo! they are joyful.


39.66 Nay! but serve Allah alone and be of the thankful.


40.12 That is because when Allah alone was called upon, you disbelieved, and when associates were given to Him, you believed; so judgment belongs to Allah, the High, the Great.


Allah's Qur'an is The Book of Knowledge and Authority and there is no such saying in Al-Qur'an as.....La ilaha illa [Allah, Mohammed] ur RasulAllah.


Yes, my Din, according to Allah and His Qur'an is just the first part, there is God but Allah. When one utters the second part, one commits shirk, in that, it makes Muhammad a partner in guidance [via the hadiths of Bukhari and Co.] with Allah. Do you notice the juxtaposition of Allah's name and Muhammad's? This is forbidden to do, hence, shirk, to wit:


19.65 The Lord of the heavens and the earth and what is between them, so serve Him and be patient in His service. Do you know any whose name is worthy to be mentioned side by side with His? -Asad Muhammad


2:2 This is The Book; in IT is guidance sure, without doubt, to those who fear Allah.


18:1 (All) praise is due to Allah, Who revealed the Book to His servant and did not make in it any crookedness/discrepancies.


49.6 O you who believe! if a wicked person[fasiq] comes to you with a report, look carefully into it, lest you harm a people in ignorance, then be sorry for what you have done.


25:33. And no question/arguement do they bring to thee but We reveal to you the truth and the best explanation (thereof).


2.185 The month of Ramazan is that in which the Quran was revealed, as guidance to men and clear proofs of the guidance and the criterion; therefore whoever of you is present in the month, he shall fast therein, and whoever is sick or upon a journey, then (he shall fast) a (like) number of other days; Allah desires ease for you, and He does not desire for you difficulty, and (He desires) that you should complete the number and that you should exalt the greatness of Allah for His having guided you and that you may give thanks.


25.31 And thus have We made for every prophet an enemy from among the sinners and sufficient/enough is your Lord as a Guide and a Helper.


29.51 Is it not sufficient/enough for them that We have revealed to you the Book which is recited to them? Most surely there is mercy in this and a reminder for a people who believe.


84:20-21. What then is the matter with them, that they believe not?- And when the Qur'an is read to them, they do not make obeisance?,


4.48 Surely Allah does not forgive that anything should be associated with Him, and forgives what is besides that to whomsoever He pleases; and whoever associates anything with Allah, he devises indeed a great sin.


7:33. Say: the things that my Lord hath indeed forbidden are: shameful deeds, whether open or secret; sins and trespasses against truth or reason; assigning of partners to Allah, for which He hath given no authority; and saying things about Allah of which ye have no knowledge.


21:24. Or have they taken for worship (other) gods besides him? Say, "Bring your convincing proof: this is the Message of those with me and the Message of those before me." But most of them know not the Truth, and so turn away.


17:36. And pursue not that of which thou hast no knowledge; for every act of hearing, or of seeing or of (feeling in) the heart will be enquired into (on the Day of Reckoning).


10:32. Such is Allah, your real Cherisher and Sustainer: apart from truth, what (remains) but error? How then are ye turned away?


Main Entry: ASSOCIATE: make a logical or causal connection: tp join as a partner, friend, or companion: to join or conncet together:combine.


Main Entry: AUTHORITY: official permission or approval: the legal power or rights given by a principal and accepted by the agent to act on the principal's behalf in performing specific acts or negotiations.


Main Entry: ERROR: an act or condition or imprudent deviation from a code of behavior: an act involving an unintentional deviation from truth or accuracy: an act through ignorance, deficiency, or accident departs from or fails to achieve what should be done: an illusion about the nature of reality that is the cause of human suffering: the contradiction of truth: an instance of false belief.


Main Entry: a GOD: a person or thing of supreme value: a powerful person or ruler: assuming the word always refers to a non-man is an error, as the Greeks referred to many with authority as Theos [mighty One]. A man od such superior qualiites that he seems like a diety to the other people.


Main Entry: OBSTINATE: perversely or tenaciously adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguements or persuasion.


Main Entry: SUPERSTITION: a belief or practice resulting from ignorance or a false


The position that the so-called sunnah/hadith of The Prophet, , is necessarily supplemental/co-equal to the Qur-an and, is therefore necessary to take shahada, practice Al-Islam and to enter Paradise, is absolutely unfounded and is categorically rejected by Allah, Most High.


As with the bible, there is some wisdom/guidance to be found in the hadiths/sunnah, however, neither of these two sources of wisdom/guidance is free of error, therefore, the hadiths, as with the bible, as bodies of work, are not fully/sufficiently reliable for guidance, hence, the hadiths are not necessary for one to become Muslim, to practice Al-Islam, and to enter Paradise. In addition, whatever truth/wisdom/guidance is found in the hadiths, is already detailed in Al-Qur-an anyway, so, what is the point of referring to them for guidance, it would be redundant?


If you say, as many do,.."take from the hadiths what you think is true and reject what you think is untrue", then, certainly, you must agree that the hadiths cannot be a reliable source of guidance, because anyone can accept or reject as they see fit, hence, the hadiths cannot be a source of tauhid, but only a source of ongoing fitna as they are today. Al-Qur-an, cannot be approached on an accept or reject basis, hence, it is a complete and inerrant source of guidance and tauhid. There are no descrepencies in Al-Qur-an, but there are in the hadiths. Reject that which is a source of doubt (hadith) for that which is not a source of doubt (Al-Qur-an).


The hadiths, as with the bible, are full of discrepencies/contradictions, hence, as a body of work, the hadiths are no more reliable for guidance than that hadith called the Bible. To pick and choose which hadith you would deem appropriate, only leaves the door open for sectarianism. The hadiths can only divide us not bring us together. "Leave that which makes you doubt (hadiths) for that which does not make you doubt (Al-Qur-an Karriem)"----ascribed to the Prophet [ my insertions]. The hadith supporters want to talk about the chain of transmission as if it some infallible ssytem for preserving information, which, of course it is not. And how does one go about proving that anyway? How does one prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that, not only that the chain is unbroken, but that what is actually purported to have been said by the narrators hasn't been altered? You don't know for a fact do you? The only thing without doubt and the source of proof regarding our Din is Al-Qur'an...it is the criterion for what is fact and proof and what is not, to wit:


2:185 The month of Ramazan is that in which the Quran was revealed, a guidance to men and clear proofs of the guidance and the criterion; therefore whoever of you is present in the month, he shall fast therein, and whoever is sick or upon a journey, then (he shall fast) a (like) number of other days; Allah desires ease for you, and He does not desire for you difficulty, and (He desires) that you should complete the number and that you should exalt the greatness of Allah for His having guided you and that you may give thanks.


Main Entry: CRITERION: more at certain: a standard on which a judgment or decision may be based.


Main Entry: CERTAIN: known or proved to be true : indisputable, dependable, reliable.


For example, regarding the so-called Last Sermon:


QUOTE


(a) Jabir ibn Abdullah reported during his farewell sermon the Prophet said, " ... and I have left with you one thing; if you hold on to it firmly, you will never stray, i.e. God's Scripture. "You will be asked about me. So what will you say?" They said, "We will vouchsafe that you have truthfully and completely delivered the message and brought the remainder." (Muslim) (Emphasis added)


( Jabir ibn Abdullah reported that the Prophet said in his farewell sermon during his final pilgrimage, "And I have left among you one thing; if you hold on to it firmly, you will never stray – God's Scripture and whatever you have gained from questioning me (hadith) (Muslim) (Emphasis added)


Surely Jabir ibn Abdullah could have narrated only one of the above versions. Version ( with its extra wording is an obvious addition to the original.


The second (or actually the third) record of this same event is attributed to Anas ibn Malik (a companion) who concedes that it is only a weak hadith. It says:


I have left you two things, so long as you hold tightly to them both, you will never stray – Allah's Holy Quran and the Sunnah of His Messenger (Muwatta) (Emphasis added)


It is interesting to note that this hadith is classified as a `weak' hadith by the hadith writers themselves. To further highlight this incongruity, Ibn Ishaq, another early chronicler, reports,


Al-Zuhri informed me from Anas ibn Malik: "While Abu Bakr was receiving allegiance from the followers the day after the Prophet had died, Omar stood up and spoke to the people, `O People! God has left you His Scripture, with which He guided His Messenger.' "


You can see from these examples, just how confusing and contradicting the hadith of Bukhari et al are. The vast majority of Muslims cite this hadith to rationalize using the hadiths, however, it is clear is a problem with which accounts are true!


There are nine volumes to the Bukhari hadiths and four volumes to the Muslim hadiths, not to mention the Sunnan, Dawud, and Tirmidhi hadiths. How many of these hadiths have you read and how many do you know and trust? How many are required to accept as fard?


"39.28": An Arabic Quran without any crookedness, that they may guard (against evil).


"39.29": Allah sets forth an example: There is a slave in whom are (several) partners differing with one another, and there is another slave wholly owned by one man. Are the two alike in condition? (All) praise is due to Allah. Nay! most of them do not know.


"One man", by analogy is Allah, Most High and His Book, Al-Qur-an.


"Several partners", by analogy, are...Bukhari, Muslim, Dawud, Sunnan, Tirmidhi, Hanifi, Shafi, Maliki, Wahhabbi, and or whatever besides Him.


Say, for example, 25 people are thinking about taking their shahadas and they all have Qur-ans, but no hadiths. They all board a plane, but the plane goes down and they find themselves marooned on an island, like in the movie Castaway. They don't know it but, they will be there for next ten years. Now, I ask you, do they have enough information to:


1. to take shahada and become Muslim,


2. to practice righteousness/Al-Islam,


3. to enter Paradise based on that practice?


AL-QUR'AN ON HADITH


33:53 O ye who believe! Enter not the Prophet's houses,- until leave is given you,- for a meal, (and then) not (so early as) to wait for its preparation: but when ye are invited, enter; and when ye have taken your meal, disperse, without seeking familiar talk. Such (behaviour) annoys the Prophet: he is ashamed to dismiss you, but Allah is not ashamed (to tell you) the truth. And when ye ask (his ladies) for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs. Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah's Messenger, or that ye should marry his widows after him at any time. Truly such a thing is in Allah's sight an enormity.


33:53 Ya ayyuha allatheena amanoo la tadkhuloo buyoota alnnabiyyi illa an yu/thana lakum ila taAAamin ghayra nathireena inahu walakin itha duAAeetum faodkhuloo fa-itha taAAimtum faintashiroo wala musta/niseena lihadeethin inna thalikum kana yu/thee alnnabiyya fayastahyee minkum waAllahu la yastahyee mina alhaqqi wa-itha saaltumoohunna mataAAan fais-aloohunna min wara-i hijabin thalikum atharu liquloobikum waquloobihinna wama kana lakum an tu/thoo rasoola Allahi wala an tankihoo azwajahu min baAAdihi abadan inna thalikum kana AAinda Allahi AAatheeman


45: 6. Tilka ayatu Allahi natlooha AAalayka bialhaqqi fabi-ayyi hadeethin baAAda Allahi waayatihi yu/minoona


45: 6. Such are the Signs of Allah, which We rehearse to thee in Truth; then in what exposition will they believe after Allah and His Signs?


7:185 . Awalam yanthuroo fee malakooti alssamawati waal-ardi wama khalaqa Allahu min shay-in waan AAasa an yakoona qadi iqtaraba ajaluhum fabi-ayyi hadeethin baAAdahu yu/minoona.


7:185. Do they see nothing in the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and all that Allah hath created? (Do they not see) that it may well be that their terms is nigh drawing to an end? In what message after this will they then believe?


77:50. Fabi-ayyi hadeethin baAAdahu yu/minoona


77:50. Then what Message, after that, will they believe in?


39:23. Allahu nazzala ahsana alhadeethi kitaban mutashabihan mathaniya taqshaAAirru minhu juloodu allatheena yakhshawna rabbahum thumma taleenu julooduhum waquloobuhum ila thikri Allahi thalika huda Allahi yahdee bihi man yashao waman yudlili Allahu fama lahu min hadin


39:23. Allah has revealed (from time to time) the most beautiful Message in the form of a Book, consistent with itself, (yet) repeating (its teaching in various aspects): the skins of those who fear their Lord tremble thereat; then their skins and their hearts do soften to the remembrance of Allah. Such is the guidance of Allah. He guides therewith whom He pleases, but such as Allah leaves to stray, can have none to guide.


31:6. Wamina alnnasi man yashtaree lahwa alhadeethi liyudilla AAan sabeeli Allahi bighayri AAilmin wayattakhithaha huzuwan ola-ika lahum AAathabun muheenun


31:6. But there are, among men, those who purchase idle tales, without knowledge (or meaning), to mislead (men) from the Path of Allah and throw ridicule (on the Path): for such there will be a humiliating Chastisement.


52:34. Falya/too bihadeethin mithlihi in kanoo sadiqeena


52:34. Let them then produce a saying like unto it,- If (it be) they speak the truth!


No, hadith, other than that of Allah, Most High, Al-Qur-an Karriem, is authorized by Him. What is there to question after this?


The point is that, Allah, Most High, promised to protect the Qur-an from tampering. He made no such promise in regard to other hadiths, hence, they are not protected and are NOT authorized by Allah, Most High as a source of guidance. History and the Qur-aan, have clearly shown the hadiths to have been tampered with, hence, they can only be a source of doutful information. Allah, Most High, has told us to avoid what is doubtful for that which is not doubtful.


Consider the following verses and definitions:


39:45. When Allah, alone, is mentioned, the hearts of those who believe not in the Hereafter are filled with disgust; but when those beside Him are mentioned, behold, they are filled with joy!


19:65 The Sustainer of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them! Worship, then, Him alone, and remain steadfast in His worship! Dost thou know any whose name is worthy to be mentioned side by side with His?"


14.52: This is a sufficient exposition for the people and that they may be warned thereby, and that they may know that He is One God and that those possessed of understanding may mind.


8.64: O Prophet! Allah is sufficient for you and (for) such of the believers as follow you.


9.129: But if they turn back, say: Allah is sufficient for me, there is no god but He; on Him do I rely, and He is the Lord of mighty power.


25.31: "And thus have We made for every prophet an enemy from among the sinners and sufficient is your Lord as a Guide and a Helper.


17.65: Surely (as for) My servants, you have no authority over them; and your Lord is sufficient as a Protector.


39.36: Is not Allah sufficient for His servant? And they seek to frighten you with those besides Him; and whomsoever Allah makes err, there is no guide for him.


39.38: And should you ask them, Who created the heavens and the earth? They would most certainly say: Allah. Say: Have you then considered that what you call upon besides Allah, would they, if Allah desire to afflict me with harm, be the removers of His harm, or (would they), if Allah desire to show me mercy, be the withholders of His mercy? Say: Allah is sufficient for me; on Him do the reliant rely.


25.58: And rely on the Ever-living Who dies not, and celebrate His praise; and Sufficient is He as being aware of the faults of His servants.


65.3: And give him sustenance from whence he thinks not; and whoever trusts in Allah, He is sufficient for him; surely Allah attains His purpose; Allah indeed has appointed a measure for everything.


It is apparent from these above ayats that, Allah, Most High, has made it clear that He is sufficient alone, has detailed everything, needing no assistance, further clarification, etc.


Main Entry: SUFFICIENT : enough to meet the needs of a situation or a proposed end.


Main Entry: ENOUGH: occurring in such quantity, quality, or scope as to fully meet demands, needs, or expectations.


Do you believe that the hadiths of Bukhari and Co. are without error, mistakes, contradictions or doubt? If yes, then they, as with Al-Qur'an, are perfect/without doubt. If no, then why would Allah have us follow something for guidance which contains mistakes, errors, contradictions and is doubtful? How can something imperfect/doubtful, the hadiths of Bukhari and Co., support/explain something which is perfect/without doubt--Al-Qur'an? Hasn't Allah forbidden us to follow that which is doubtful/conjectural?


53.28 And they have no knowledge of it; they do not follow anything but conjecture, and surely conjecture does not avail against the truth at all.


Main Entry: WITNESS: one who has personal knowledge of something.


Do you have any direct/personal knowledge of what Muhammad said or didn't say or did or didn't do, given that, you were not a witness? No, you follow the hearsay of Bukhari and Co., and they had no direct/personal knowledge of what Muhammad said or didn't say or did or didn't do either. In the following ayat, Allah, informs the Messenger that, he was not a witness to events before him and only knows of that which he did not witness through direct revelation from Allah.


28:44 Thou wast not on the Western side when We decreed the Commission to Moses, nor wast thou a witness (of those events).


So, given that, the Messenger, did not witness things before him and only knows of somethings via wahy/revelation, then how do we justify following the hadiths of Bukahri and Co. when they too did not witness what the Messenger said or did or did not say or do and were not the recipients of revelation?


So, I ask you:


One individual has only Al-Qur'an and another individual has both Al-Qur'an and the hadiths of Bukhari and Co., which of the two is better guided?


ON THE SUNNAH


There is no Sunnah of the Prophet or Sunnah of Muhammad or Sunnah of the Messenger mentioned in Al-Qur'an. The only two sunnahs mentioned are the Sunnah of Allah and the sunnah of the ancients.


15:13 La yuminoona bihi waqad khalat sunnatu alawwaleena


15:13 That they should not believe in the (Message); but the ways of the ancients have passed away.


35:43. Istikbaran fee al-ardi wamakra alssayyi-i wala yaheequ almakru alssayyi-o illa bi-ahlihi fahal yanthuroona illa sunnata al-awwaleena falan tajida lisunnati Allahi tabdeelan walan tajida lisunnati Allahi tahweelan


35:43 On account of their arrogance in the land and their plotting of Evil, but the plotting of Evil will hem in only the authors thereof. Now are they but looking for the way the ancients were dealt with? But no change wilt thou find in Allah.s way (of dealing): no turning off wilt thou find in Allah's way.


33:38 Ma kana AAala alnnabiyyi min harajin feema farada Allahu lahu sunnata Allahi fee allatheena khalaw min qablu wakana amru Allahi qadaran maqdooran


33:38 There can be no difficulty to the Prophet in what Allah has indicated to him as a duty. It was the practice of Allah amongst those of old that have passed away. And the command of Allah is a decree determined.


33:62 Sunnata Allahi fee allatheena khalaw min qablu walan tajida lisunnati Allahi tabdeelan


33:62This is practice of Allâh that has been coming from long before for the affairs of such people, and you people will not find any change in the way of Allâh.


48:23 Sunnata Allahi allatee qad khalat min qablu walan tajida lisunnati Allahi tabdeelan


48:23 This is the Way of Allâh which has been coming from the past, and you will not find any discrepancy in the Way of Allâh.


As you can see, there is no sunnah of the Prophet or Sunnah of Muhammad mentioned in Al-Qur'an. The only sunnah's mentioned are those of Allah and the attitude of the ancients which persists to this day. To subscribe to a sunnah of the Prophet then, when no such ayat gives authority to do so, is to make the Prophet a partner with Allah.


Shirk, then,--is the calling upon/associating others with Allah [see the post to Eternity for the ayats on shirk]. To refer to a sunnah of the Prophet, which, is realized through the bodies of work called the hadiths, i.e. Bukhari et al, is to call on others beside Allah. Now, let me ask you this, is the Messenger here with us today? Well, of course the obvious answer is no, he is with Allah, hence, whereas the people who lived with him while he was alive witnessed what he did, well, at least now and then anyway, however, we today do not have him in our presence. You and the other other supporters of the hadiths claim that, we can know what the Messenger did or didn't or said or didn't say, through them, hence, the hadiths then, are the things/vehicle, by which you claim to know things about the Messenger/the practice Al-Islam, hence, you've now associated the hadith/hadith compilers, as as associates/a source of guidance along with Allah.


Main Entry: TRUTH: the state of being the case : FACT (2) : the body of real things, events, and facts.


Al-Qur'an, as a body of work, is ALL/TOTAL truth, it has no flaws whatsoever.


Main Entry: HALF-TRUTH: a statement that is only partially true : a statement that mingles truth and falsehood with deliberate intent to deceive.


The hadiths of Bukahri and Co., as a body of work, as with the bible, is a mixture of truth and falsehood, hence, it is flawed, hence, it cannot be from be from Allah or supported by him in the least. Allah, doesn't support conjecture and flawed data for our guidance.


The people who lived with the Messenger certainly were witnesses to what he did or didn't or said or didn't say, however, the compilers of the hadiths/so-called witness accounts, were not present with the Messenger or his companion/witnesses. What the hadiths attribute to the Messenger and his conpanions cannot be verified, because no one alive today witnessed their actions. In adddition, neither the Messenger nor the companions supervised or signed-off on what today is attributed to them, hence, the hadiths, if brought into a court of law, would be thrown out summarily, because they constitute second and third party accounts, that is, hearsay.


Now, here are the important questions:


1. Could the Messenger have said anything doubtful, contradictory or not 100% the truth?


2. Are the hadiths 100% truthful, free of error, doubt, mistake or contradiction?


3. Could the Messenger ever have misguided anyone?


The answers to the above questions are an obvious no, hence, the hadiths cannot be the practice of the Prophet, because he could never teach anything or call anyone to that which was not 100% the truth, doubtful or contradictory...now could he?


Some Muslims go backpacking in the remote Ozark mountains of Tenneesee and upon leaving one of them discovers that he left his Qur'an [in english] at the camp site. Well, one of the residents of the area who lives there happens upon the Qur'an and begins to read it. Now...


a. will that person know who Allah is and what He has commanded mankind to do?


b. Will that person know how to take shahada?


c. will that person know how to practice righteousness?


d. will that person know how to call upon/pray to Allah?


e. will that person, upon reading Al-Qur'an and following its contents, be admitted to Paradise?


39.2] Surely We have revealed to you the Book with the truth, therefore serve Allah, being sincere to Him in obedience.


39.3] Now, surely, sincere obedience is due to Allah (alone) and (as for) those who take guardians besides Him, (saying), We do not serve them save that they may make us nearer to Allah, surely Allah will judge between them in that in which they differ; surely Allah does not guide him aright who is a liar, ungrateful.


Do you see what Allah is saying here? obedience is due to Him alone, but you and all of those who support the obviously corrupted hadiths, say that, by doing so...it brings you nearer to Allah.


We don't have any direct explanations of the Messenger on anything, what we have are the "alleged" explanations and, given how these so-called explanations conflict in many cases, we know based on that the hadiths are not 100% reliable, hence, are not the explanations of the Messenger.


Allah, refers to His Qur'an as being the Guidance and the Clear Book which is fully detailed, omits nothing, complete, sufficient/enough, explaining everything in detail and answers all questions and arguements with the best explanation [ this means that, relative to the Object of Life/The Supreme Achievement, Allah Qur'an explains and answers every question:


3:185 Every soul shall taste of death, and you shall only be paid fully your reward on the resurrection day; then whoever is removed far away from the fire and is made to enter the garden he indeed has attained the object (of life); and the life of this world is nothing but a provision of vanities.


4:13 Those are limits set by Allah. those who obey Allah and His Messenger will be admitted to Gardens with rivers flowing beneath, to abide therein (for ever) and that will be the supreme achievement.


With this in mind then, Al-Qur'an, is sufficient/enough, as Allah says it is, for our spiritual guidance, growth and development and for the establishing of Islamic jurispruence, in order that we may practice righteousness in this world and by doing so that, we obtain Paradise, the object of life and the supreme achievement, in the world to come. Now, has Allah not detailed fully all that is necessary towards this end for His human being in His Qur'an?]


As 77:50 says:


39.66 Nay! but serve Allah alone and be of the thankful.


10.32 This then is Allah, your true Lord; and what is there after the truth but error; how are you then turned back?


77:50. Fabi-ayyi hadeethin baAAdahu yu/minoona


77:50. Then what Message, after that, will they believe in?

Maskhadov: “Russian-Chechen War will outlive Putin.”


23.07.2004


“The Chechen people are waging a war against international terrorism, headed by the Russian leadership”


Maskhadov: “Russian-Chechen War will outlive Putin.”


“The Chechen people are waging a war against international terrorism, headed by the Russian leadership”


President of Chechen Republic of Ichkeria Aslan Maskhadov told the journalists in an e-mail exchange with Reuters that Chechens have the right to be carrying out operations on the Russian soil and that the conflict will most likely to be expanding. President Maskhadov was skeptical about negotiations and predicted that the war would outlast Putin.


«Negotiations for Chechens are not an end in themselves», he stated, - «We look at them as one of the paths to ending the fighting. As sad as it sounds, I think the current Russian-Chechen war will outlive Putin», Maskhadov wrote.


He dismissed a Russian plan to hold an election for a new Chechen leader on August 29 as a 'farce' that would only make a peaceful solution more difficult to achieve.


«Any political figure named by the occupiers ... will be branded a quisling», President Maskhadov wrote, -«Quislings have one fate, which no normal person would choose».


Maskhadov denied being behind a large-scale attack last month in Ingushetia. But he said he would not be surprised if there were similar operations in other parts of Russia.


«As for Chechens carrying fighting into Russian territory, my opinion is: this would be absolutely legitimate -- in any case, no less legitimate than the allies in World War II carrying fighting into the territory of Hitler's Germany,” he stressed. «If Chechens possessed warplanes or rockets, then air strikes on Russian cities would also be legitimate», he wrote.


President Maskhadov complained that the Western leaders, who would urge Putin to enter negotiations, which he was counting on, had become «hostages to their own fear», accepting too quickly Russia's arguments that Chechens were linked to terrorism. «I have said and continue to say: the Chechen people are waging a war against international terrorism, headed by the Russian leadership», he said.


«All independent media, all humanitarian organizations know and declare that what is happening in Chechnya is the deliberate murder of a civilian population on ethnic grounds. Yet leaders of the top Western countries are unconscionably repeating the Kremlin's lie about thousands of Chechens in Afghanistan or Iraq, supposedly fiercely opposing coalition forces».


«I don't know, maybe some of these al-Qaeda people came to Chechnya, although I can't imagine what they were looking for here. We are fighting for our freedom and have no aim of global domination. The United States is not our enemy or competitor».


Source: http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/article.php?id=3005

Salaam Alaikum!


Tell me what you all think of this frivolity!


http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/...ealth.html

MOON rock?

Hardline Jewish threat to al-Aqsa Mosque


By Khalid Amayreh in the West Bank


Sunday 25 July 2004, 15:36 Makka Time, 12:36 GMT


Israel's Public Security Minister Tzahi Hanegbi has said hardline Jewish groups may be planning to carry out attacks on the two most sacred Islamic shrines in East Jerusalem.


Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock are collectively known as al-Haram al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary). Originally built in CE711 (AD711), al-Aqsa Mosque is Islam's third holiest place, after the two Holy Mosques in Saudi Arabia.


Hanegbi said in a TV interview at the weekened that the goal of the potential attackers would be to thwart the Israeli plan for unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.


But a former leader of an armed Jewish group that sought to bomb al-Aqsa Mosque in the late 1970s, told the Israeli state-run radio on Sunday the purpose of any "new action" would not have anything to do with the "disengagement plan".


The Israeli newspaper Haaretz on Sunday quoted officials in the domestic intelligence service, Shin Bet, as saying there was a possibility of Jewish hardliners trying to destroy al-Aqsa Mosque by crashing a radio-controlled plane into it.


There are numerous Millenarian Jewish groups in Israel dedicated to the destruction of the mosque to facilitate the "rebuilding" of the "Third Temple" on the site.


Messianic Jews believe the destruction of the mosque and construction of the temple would expedite the appearance of a Jewish messiah, or redeemer, who would rule the world from Jerusalem and bring about the salvation of the Jewish people.


Ultimate red line


Muslim leaders in Palestine have warned of "unforeseeable consequences" and "horrible repercussions" all over the world in case "anything happened to al-Aqsa Mosque".


"This is the ultimate red line. If <b>Jewish terrorists</b> embarked on such an act of sheer madness, they would trigger huge fires all over the world … . Only God knows how the fires would be extinguished," said Kamal Khatib, deputy head of Israel's powerful Islamic Movement.


Speaking to Aljazeera.net he said an attack on al-Aqsa Mosque would be viewed as an appalling provocation by the world's Muslim population.


If such a thing happened, God forbid, it would galvanise the world's 1.2 billion Muslims, and there would be a backlash and anger all over the world."


Khatib said the Islamic Movement in Israel remained vigilant against the risk of an attack on the Islamic holy places in Jerusalem.


"We send thousands of people to the Haram al-Sharif every day to make up for the barring by Israel of our people from the West Bank and Gaza Strip from accessing the mosque … and we see to it that there are no loopholes in security arrangements," he said.


Security pretext?


The highest-ranking Muslim cleric in East Jerusalem, Shaikh Ikrama Sabri, says Jewish extremists are capable of doing the unthinkable.


"We know quite well that they are conniving and coordinating their plans with the Israeli security establishment," he said.


"We also know that the Israeli state uses the extremists as a supplemental tool to achieve its thinly disguised goals, including the destruction of Islam's holy places in Jerusalem."


But in the present contest, Sabri cautioned, Israel may be trying to gain a "foothold" inside al-Haram al-Sharif compound under the pretext of "ensuring the security of the place".


He said after the 1994 Hebron massacre, in which 29 Arab worshippers were killed by a messianic Jewish immigrant from Brooklyn, the Israeli army, in effect, took over the town's historic Ibrahimi Mosque and gave the bulk of the holy place to Jewish settlers.


The "arrangement" then was justified by the Israelis on security grounds – to prevent a repetition of the massacre, Sabri said.


He said the Israeli authorities knew the Jewish hardliners individually, but did not take action against them for political reasons.


"Look, the police know them one by one, but the extremists have strong allies and supporters within the government, the Knesset and the security establishment, so much so that it seems as if they are the real rulers of Israel," Sabri said.


Inspection tours?


The Israeli police currently permit religious Jews to enter al-Aqsa Mosque compound despite strong objection from the Supreme Muslim Council, which is in charge of the administration of the holy place.


Israeli officials, including security chiefs, say Jews have a right to visit the holy place they call Temple Mount just like anybody else.


However, Waqf officials, who are entrusted with the upkeep of the holy sanctuary, say trips by Zionist zealots are not simple visits, but in fact "inspection tours" aimed at drawing up destructive designs on al-Haram al-Sharif.


Their fears are hardly misplaced. On Sunday a Jewish rabbi allied with the messianic Gush Emunim movement which advocates the expulsion and extermination of non-Jews in Israel - told the Israeli army radio, Gali Tsahal, he fully supported the destruction of al-Aqsa Mosque.


"This is more than a positive thing - this is a desirable thing, and I am looking forward to seeing these mosques reduced to ruins," said Yehuda Tzion, who in 1980 headed the underground Jewish group that had planned to bomb al-Aqsa.


Tzion has urged the Israeli government to "send army bulldozers to the site and destroy these buildings once and for all … and if the state is not willing to do so, let other Jews do it".


One of the messianic Jewish groups that openly calls for the destruction of al-Aqsa is the Temple Mount Faithful, headed by Girshon Solomon.


A few years ago, he told the Israeli television, with the golden Dome of the Rock in the background - that: "it is time this pagan edifice ceased to exist".


Such highly provocative statements go unpunished in Israel as long as they are made against non-Jews.


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/AD9...7ADC09047CB.htm