Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Terrorists Suing ‘terrorists’!
#1

Four Israelis arrested in New York on September 11, 2001, found dancing and carrying explosives in their vane near the World Trade Center, filed a multi-million-dollar suit in the United States on Monday against the American Department of Justice.


The four were employed by a New Jersey moving firm and the truck they were riding in was stopped near the George Washington bridge between New Jersey and New York when the Twin Towers were attacked.


The cops traced the number, establishing that it belonged to a company called Urban Moving. Police Chief John Schmidig said: "We got an alert to be on the lookout for a white Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration and writing on the side. Three individuals were seen celebrating in Liberty State Park after the impact. They said three people were jumping up and down." In the car was $4700 in cash, a couple of foreign passports and a pair of box cutters – the concealed Stanley Knife-type blades used by the 19 hijackers who’d flown jetliners into the World Trade Centre and Pentagon just hours before. There were also fresh pictures of the men standing with the smouldering wreckage of the Twin Towers in the background. One image showed a hand flicking a lighter in front of the devastated buildings, like a fan at a pop concert. The driver of the van then told the arresting officers: "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem." His name was Sivan Kurzberg. The other four passengers were Kurzberg’s brother Paul, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. [employed with "Urban Moving"]


Sunday Herald (Sydney) - 02 November 2003 -http://ww1.sundayherald.com/37707...)


The police officers arrested the four after they saw that they held foreign (Israeli) driving licenses. They were arrested as suspects in the terrorist attack and were transfered to the FBI for interrogation.


The four, who are now in Israel, claim that they were held in complete isolation, without being allowed to meet with their attorneys or their families, and were exposed to harsh interrogation methods, physical abuse, sleep deprivation and racist insults

Reply
#2

In the United States, everyone, including the Jews whom you seem to have an almost insane obession with disdaining, are gauranteed equal protection under the law (4th amendment of the Constitution.) Even if these men had been guilt of terrorism, they are still entitled to a fair arrest and iterrogation process. The treatment they reportedly received was unlawful and should be investigated. Be it Muslim or Jew or anything else, the American justice system needs to guarantee rights even to the most unsavory of people in order to establish a credible and respected "dikaosyne" or "justiceness" much like the Isrealis did with the trial of Adolph Ichmann.


All terrorists, Jews and Muslims, must be brought to justice. But the claims made by these Isrealis merit investigation, and they are right in suing the Department of Justice.

Reply
#3



Quote:In the United States, everyone, including the Jews whom you seem to have an almost insane obession with disdaining, are gauranteed equal protection under the law (4th amendment of the Constitution.) Even if these men had been guilt of terrorism, they are still entitled to a fair arrest and iterrogation process. The treatment they reportedly received was unlawful and should be investigated. Be it Muslim or Jew or anything else, the American justice system needs to guarantee rights even to the most unsavory of people in order to establish a credible and respected "dikaosyne" or "justiceness" much like the Isrealis did with the trial of Adolph Ichmann.
All terrorists, Jews and Muslims, must be brought to justice. But the claims made by these Isrealis merit investigation, and they are right in suing the Department of Justice.

Hmmmm! That’s what you think, eh!


Here is ‘a appetizer’ from a book “Open Secrets”, written by no other than an Israeli Jew – Professor Israel Shahak. And if this doesn’t show you “how equal the 2% US Jews” are with the rest of 98% US population – I would be glad to refer you to a US Christian Congressman, Paul Findely’s book “Silence no More” to show the readers how the Jewish mafia like AIPAC, ADL, and JDL control the US administration.


"territories in dispute". The Palestinians are understandably angry. But lest they be accused of anti-Semitism, they cannot, God forbid, talk about Clinton's "Jewish connection". After all, for its own purposes, the PLO wants anything as much as to keep its lines of communication with the Jewish community in the US open, because it perceives that community as so formidably powerful. Let it be recalled that Arafat chose in 1988 a delegation of American Jews as a channel to publicize his decision to recognize Israel, because he 6elieved that only via them might he gain some legitimacy for himself.' Like the rulers of Third World countries whom I mentioned earlier, Arafat seems to have firmly believed in the myth of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.


Benvenisti acknowledges that `Israel benefits from Jewish influence', but he also points to the resultant dangers: `The uncontrollability of the American Jewish establishment, together with its presumption that it represents Israeli interests "better" than Israel's elected government does, should be a matter for concern because American Jewish leaders tend to be more hawkish than the present leaders of Israel are.' Benvenisti observes that `their involvement in Israeli politics was recognized long ago as legitimate.' He also discusses their increasing financial support for the Israeli parties and movements as a manifestation of legitimacy. Even more importantly he indicates the difference between Israeli Jews and organized US Jewry: `The Jewish community in Israel is a sovereign body, its membership is determined by binding state laws and it bears full responsibility for its fate in every walk of life. US Jewry is a voluntary body, has power only over those who choose co accept its authority and even this power is limited in scope. Whoever wants to 6ear full responsibility should come and bear it here. Those who prefer to bear only a partial or marginal responsibility are free to choose so, provided they do not demand for themselves a status they do not qualify for.' It is rather curious that after defining the American Jewry as `a voluntary body', Benvenisti deplores its `uncontrollability'. But in Zionism such paradoxes abound....."


I never said that "the hacker" post under only 'one ID' [Image: blink.gif]


Shalom [Image: biggrin.gif]

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)