Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Juba ...The baghdad sniper 2
#1

:assalam:


Here is the second episode of Baghdad Sniper Filmography (Juba 2 ) which reveals the tragedy of U.S infantry in Baghdad - the well controlled territory by Americans


This footage presents just a small part of the sniping operations occurred in this year, since the last Juba's documentary release


Juba killed 668 U.S soldiers with his [Dragunov] Sniper Rifle, none of those operations were declared by the media of U.S army or T.V channels, although there strong presence during invasion of Iraq and Baghdad fall


It is enough to post the news.

Reply
#2
Interesting posted by an admin........
Reply
#3

Quote::assalam:


Juba killed 668 U.S soldiers with his [Dragunov] Sniper Rifle, <b>none of those operations were declared by the media of U.S army or T.V channels, </b> although there strong presence during invasion of Iraq and Baghdad fall


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Bismillah


as salam alykom


Suhail, do u mean it is interesting that an admin posts this because you dont agree with posting it?


Just look again at the quote, Insh a Allah u will understand the reason.

Reply
#4

Salam my friend JohnDoe and you too my friend Suhail 786


Suhail Eid Mubarak to you.


I was pleased to read your replies and your encouraging comment. :)


I don’t assume that all members on this board would agree with me on whatever I post or even on my trends and interests. First we must differ, then we get into a dialogue then agree, isn’t this correct?


Today, I was reading some news, actually I m interested in the news of the crusade against Islam led by the USA which the international media falsely calls it war against terrorism.


Anyway, what I focused on three news, one from Germany related to the trial of German soldiers who assaulted the bodies of Muslim warriors from Afghanistan. They even fiddled with the parts of the bodies. The news included a number of pictures of the German soldiers, one of them was carrying a sculpt, another was carrying some human remains. They were smiling for the camera.




[Image: 3a9d668af2.jpg]

The second part of the news involved a report about torture cases made by American soldiers against Muslims in Iraq. The cases included torturing children in front of their mothers eyes in order to obtain information about suspects of the family members. In some cases, the severity of torture, you wouldn’t believe, came to cutting parts of the child’s body alive right in front of the mother’s eyes which of course led to the death of a large number. Other forms of torture were taking off the defendants clothes, tie him from both hands and legs, open up his legs and allow trained vicious Dogs to attack his private parts. The commentator, who prepated the report through an interview with one of the Americans who were involved in such crimes, said that most of those who were exposed to such aggression – whose number exceeds 300 – died.


The third part of the news: It was quoted from an American news sites declaring the death of 300 Americans during an attack on Falcon base in 17th of Ramadan.


BTW, 17th of Ramadan commemorates the victory of Muslims during the battle of Badr.


Do you my friends expect that I will be sad over the death of the 300 American soldiers after watching such dreadful crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq?


I don’t think I can be that forgetful.


Yes I m actually an opponent of the Islamic resistance in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. I also see it as a legitimate act.


The victory of Muslims in the war led by the USA will be in the interest of the whole world. Not one single case was recorded in history that Muslims treat their war prisoners the way those crusades are handling our Muslim brothers.

Reply
#5

Bismillah


"However, they are solders, they are used to death for them it is no big deal. They were stupid for taking pictures of it and they have been caught and they will be repremanded no doubt."


here's an excuse that you would decry if muslims made it...


"islam you are another hypocrite in a long line of others on here."


then why come here? You visit the board more than anyone. Why is that? If you are so against muslims it seems very weird that you continually want to surround yourself with them (albeit cyberspace).


At the very least you are an interesting subject to observe.

Reply
#6

Bismillah




Quote:islam you are another hypocrite in a long line of others on here. I have no doubt you are one of these muslims that love nothing more than the snuff video beheadings of infidels that get passed around muslims for enjoyment.

JohnDoe, u know very well you are not supposed to call people names.

Reply
#7

Bismillah




Quote:You are not familiar with the way the muslims treated the Hindus during their rampage through Asia then. This would be an interesting topic.

Johndoe, if u r talking about Muslim soldiers committing transgressions in relation to Islamic warfare rules, then they are not anything more than those german soldiers to whom u just made the execuse and understood their position. It has nothing to do with Islam itself. Even during the time of the Messenger salla Allah a`lyhee wa sallam, while he was alive among the companions, one (dont recall his name right now) of the companions, during a battle, was able to defeat a kafir and put him down to the ground with the sowrd on his neck. So the kafir pronounced Shahada. But the companion still killed him. When he went back, the Messenger salla Allah a`lyhee wa sallam kept blaming him so much, he explained that he only pronounced shahada to rescue himself. The Messenger salla Allah a`lyhee wa sallam told him did u cut open his chest to verify whether or not he is genuine?


Even the most rightous people can make mistakes. But u only like to take execuses and be understanding to the non Muslims position. You are calling most of us hypocrites. Because I fear Allah prefer not to judge. What do you call your position then?

Reply
#8
http://islamsms.com/bb/index.php?showtopic=3878&hl=
Reply
#9

John I would like to take this chance to tell you something that will help you better understand how we think. Suppose that the US installed an ice cream machine in a Muslim country, let us assume Afghanistan for example. This implies that the US aims for the Afghani children to taste ice cream, isn’t this true?


No doubt Afghanis will be grateful to the Americans even if the machine was made in Japan. Gratitude will not be to Japan but to the Americans who installed the machine.


What happened is that the US didn’t install an ice cream machine but killing and destruction machines. Those German soldiers and other coaliation soldiers led by America against Islam are not but machine to instill terror, destruction and killing among Muslims which you yourself admitted when you explained about the German soldiers saying


they are solders, they are used to death
.


Whatever the nationality of those soldiers, but the US takes the responsibility. Simple because either in Afghanistan or Iraq those soldiers are there under nationality or any other capacity but because they are part of the coalition. The Baghdad hunter my friend didn’t target with his rifle the American sweet sellers but the soldiers who came for murder, destruction and damage.

Reply
#10

Before I leave you with these pics, let me tell you my comments that I came to thru your replies:


You problem lies only in them taking pics, in other words you r not against the action they committed which implies your support to this ugliness as long as it involves Muslims. You were supposed to be more neutral and objective, since you are agnostic. But it is obvious that you are inclined to strongly oppose Muslims using pre mature baseless judgments such as saying:


If these had been jewish bones, we would not have heard from you.


This judgment stems from psychosocial projections of the Jews around their enmity with the Muslims.


You are actually addressing the individuals rather than the concept itself like you describing me as a hypocrite among a long line of hypocrites. You went off topic and rather than addressing the main issue started throwing accusations about us which reflects a poor style of dialogue.


Any way, this doesn’t hurt me at all. But I m only putting the points for you to take into consideration next time since we are just starting our dialogue and we must use proper language in order to come to a result.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)