Qur'anic verse of deep interest to me

[radiyah]

Well Michelle concentrate, see this link

http://www.geocities.com/jmmahony/pgo/photo/moon.html

at the end of the page there is a photo with a fault line and under it is written

((The images above show the "Stright Wall", a lunar fault line that has shifted to form a 60 mile long, 800 foot high cliff.

The fault line is near the center of the moon's face. The first image shows it at first quarter, when sunlight is shining from the right, which is the higher side of the cliff, so the cliff casts a shadow which forms a straight black line. The second (2X close-up) image was taken at third quarter, so the sunlight is shining at the face of the cliff.

CCD images at prime focus (first image), and with a 2X barlow (second image).))

see it says straight wall, lunar fault line, it is near the center of the moon. (nasa will not say that the moon has split into 2 peices because to them it is illogical)

http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/~apod/solarsys/eng/moon.htm

this site you will find ((The dark, relatively lightly cratered maria cover about 16% of the lunar surface and is concentrated on the nearside of the Moon, mostly within impact basins. This concentration may be explained by the fact that the Moon's centre of mass is offset from its geometric centre by about 2 kilometres (1.2 miles) in the direction of Earth, probably because the crust is thicker on the farside. It is possible, therefore, that basalt magmas rising from the interior reached the surface easily on the nearside, but encountered difficulty on the farside. Mare rocks are basalt and most date from 3.8 to 3.1 billion years. Some fragments in highland breccias date to 4.3 billion years and high resolution photographs suggest some mare flows actually embay young craters and may thus be as young as 1 billion years. The maria average only a few hundred metres in thickness but are so massive they frequently deformed the crust underneath them which created fault-like depressions and raised ridges.))

the fact that the Moon's centre of mass is offset from its geometric centre by about 2 kilometres (1. 2miles) in the direction of Earth,
well don't you think this is strange when the moon is offset from it's geometric center by 2 kilometeres?? y ??

then there is the word fault in this paragraph if you press on it you will find the translation of it according to nasa " A crack or break in the crust of a planet along which slippage or movement can take place.
"

http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/~apod/nineplanets/luna.html

this 1 well i quoted this before i will again" There are two primary types of terrain on the Moon: the heavily cratered and very old highlands and the relatively smooth and younger maria. The maria (which comprise about16 % of the Moon's surface) are huge impact craters that were later flooded by molten lava. Most of the surface is covered with regolith, a mixture of fine dust and rocky debris produced by meteor impacts. For some unknown reason, the maria are concentrated on the near side. "

it says for some unkown reasons the maria are concentrated on the near side ???? well y

http://aerospacescholars.jsc.nasa.gov/HAS/...cirr/em/7/2.cfm

this says also " For some unknown reason, the maria are concentrated on the near side. Most of the craters on the near side are named for famous figures in the history of science such as Tycho, Copernicus, and Ptolemaeus. Features on the far side of the moon have more modern references such as Apollo, Gagarin and Korolev (with a distinctly Russian bias since the first images were obtained by Luna 3!). "

http://www.space.edu/moon/atlas/Nearside/Birt.html

well this shows you the fault line

http://www.space.edu/moon/atlas/Nearside/A...pineValley.html

and this 1 "The Alpine Valley is a 130 km long gash radial to the Imbrium impact basin (Mare Imbrium is at the top of the image). The valley cuts through rubbly debris and 3 km tall mountains - all material excavated by the Imbrium impact. Later mare lavas flooded the valley and a narrow sinuous rille, easi;y visible here, is difficult to see with a telescope. "

it says " later mare lavas flooded the valley and a narrow sinuous rille, easily visible here"

http://www.space.edu/moon/atlas/Farside/Compton.html

this is a new 1 see what is written "Compton (104E,56 N) is an 162 km wide impact crater intermediate in structure between normal central peak craters and peak ring (or two ring) basins. Note the fragmentary inner ring defined by clumps of peaks. In 1971 Hartmann and I named this type of transitional landform central peak basins. Compton's floor appears to be surfaced by smooth lava flows cut by roughly radial rilles, suggesting the floor has been uplifted. "

floor appears to be surfaced by smooth lava flows cut by roughly radial rilles, suggesting the floor has been uplifted ???? well y again ????

another :

http://www.space.edu/moon/atlas/Farside/oriental.htm

"Orientale is the youngest and best preserved lunar basin - it is the best guide to the structure of impact basins in the solar system, for most on the Moon and other planets are more strongly modified by lava or later impacts. Orientale's conspicuous outer or Cordillera rim has a diameter of930 km; Outer Rook ring is 480 km, and Inner Rook is 320 km. Strong radial lineations made by the scouring flow of ejecta is especially visible at top. "

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/July98/spa.html

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Oct97/MoonFeO.html

read this Michelle and I hope this will convince you. "

there is this paragraph

"Geophysicists expert in impact dynamics are convinced that a normal impact could not have produced SPA without digging up vast amounts of mantle materials. In fact, Peter Schultz (Brown University), a crater specialist who has been pondering the huge size of SPA for decades, is astonished that there is not a huge, uplifted plug of mantle material in the central portion of the basin, and wonders why the Moon was not shattered by such a huge impact. He suggests that it was not a typical, high-velocity impact. He hypothesizes that SPA was formed by the impact of a low-velocity projectile that hit at a low angle (about 30 degrees or less), hence did not dig very deeply into the Moon. During a low-angle impact, not all the energy is available for digging a crater. "

and this paragraph "

Is the floor of SPA basin a mixture of half mantle and half lower crust, as Lucey prefers, or all lower crust, as Pieters prefers? Why do the two approaches not agree? Well, actually, they do not disagree all that much. For one thing, the technique used by Pieters and co-workers cannot detect olivine in the presence of pyroxene unless its abundance is greater than about 30%. Lucey and his buddies suggest that the floor is half mantle and half lower crust. If the mantle is 50% olivine, then the average floor would only contain 25% olivine, below the amount Clementine measurements can detect. In other words, if the materials of SPA floor are very well mixed, we can't tell if the floor contains no mantle rock, or is half mantle and half crust.

there is more there read it carefully and I hope you will find the truth there.

If still not, it is ok i will keep looking for more evidence for you



May Allah Allmighty help me, and may

Allah Allmighty open your heart and

enlighten your mind.