The Arabic Bible!!!

[AlShamms]

Now my question is, using the principles of 2 Timothy 3:16, <b>where will you place the story of Judah and his daughter in law as found in Genesis 38:16-18</b> ???

Peace.....


Another story about sexual immorality? I'm beginning to wonder about yall. Yes, we know these stories are in the Bible, nothing new. Do we become obsessed with them? No, we don't. So why are you? To answer your question, this story would fall under reproof as we know incest is a sin. (Lev. 20:12) And instruct us how to be righteous by not engaging in such a sinful act.

What about <b>Genesis 19:30 "Lot and his 2 daughters to the end of story"</b>???

Same catagory

How about <b>Ezekiel 23</b>?

I've already answered questions relating to this chapter. But for clarity I'll answer again. Ezekiel 23 is a reproof, a correction, a guidance and instructions on how to be righteous before God.

Song of Solomon and the ‘<i>making love stories</i>’ how will you classify them according to 2 Timothy?

Again, if you can't understand the metaphoric language then you'll always see it as "making love stories". This book would be classified as doctrine.

Of course I can do judgment, He has given me a brain to think and decide, He, the unique God can never talk like how we “<i>filthy people</i>” talks.

Wael, again, this statement is based on your understanding of your god. It is not based on understanding of the Bible. So no, you cannot judge what you do not understand. If you had understood it, you would have known where to place the above verses you asked me about.

Very good question, I never said that the entire Bible is full of inappropriate stories etc… I did said that the Bible contains portion of God’s word, portion of prophets’ words, portion of historians words, as well as pornographic materials and absurdities which no body could attribute to God Almighty, and so we should not feel so it is just normal for our Prophet pbuh to be mentioned in the Bible because <b>parts of that Bible we may consider as God’s word</b>, <b>but not entirely.</b>

Nor did I say the "entire" book. I'm speaking specifically about the Song of Solomon which you seem to have such an issue with the language used. Allow me to restate my question:


If, as you say, this particular book is filled with, as you say, filthy language, then why would your god place the name of your prophet among such "filthy language"? And why would you, as a muslim, look to that verse, in that book (song of solomon) filled with filthy language as validation that the Bible mentions your prophet? Let's look at this particular verse:


Song of Solomon 5:16


(16) His mouth is most sweet: yea, he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.


According to the excerpt that Reepi provided the words "altogether lovely" are where your prophet's name is mentioned and should be translated:


"His language is most sweet, and he is Muhammad."


Wael, is it your opinion that this verse is speaking about your prophet?


Shamms