07-14-2007, 05:03 PM
Bismillah
as salam alykom
I never meant that just because u dont agree with me there is a problem Karbala, nor do I mean that u have to believe Tafseer Sharawy. However, also I made another post which is really how I feel. Which is i see the enemy is just pushing hard for us to stand and argue over who are really the Messenger's household, although this is not a a`qida foundation. Aqida means Tawheed of Allah's Names, Attributes, Tawheed in every aspect of our lives.
However, again because i use my mind, hadeeth al kisa is correct, whether or not it includes the wives, is your issue. The Messenger salla Allah a`lyhee wa sallam asking Umm Salama to keep in her position because she is on Khair means she does not need this. Rijs is sins, filth...etc.
But did u think when did this hadeeth take place. It was after all of his daughters (sorry they are all his) died including also his only grandson Ruqqiyah and only Ummamah was left who was also the daughter of Othman. Thus, at that time he didnt have any other children but Fatima and her household.
Regarding the wives, as I said, this is how u understand it, one of the Quran miracles is that each one of us can understand according to his/her level of intellict.
But just to conclude this issue for me, how exactly they are Ma`soum? I mean in which sense. Because of many things proved in hadeeth.
Haji, I was going to make the same comment about the adoption issue, but thought they might be thinking that the Messenger salla Allah a`lyhee wa sallam did adopt them befor Ayah of Tahreem of adoption was revealed in Ahzab as well, which of course was revealed after their birth, it was the time of marrying Zainab Bint Jahsh when he adopted Zaid. BTW Karbal, Zaid is the only companion whose name was clearly stated in Quran. Dont u see this as a very special rank unlike anyone else????