02-15-2007, 08:29 PM
mel your making less and less sense every post, you cherry pick my responses , and those you do answer are so bizarre and shows a total lack of understanding of what it is your trying to critisize.
Quote: Perfect understanding… But do you call your mother woman? Is there anyone who has little respect for his mother will ever call her WOEMAN?
since when is it offensive to be called a women? i would say my mother is a women... i cant say ive ever checked but the evidence suggesting she IS a women is some what irrefutable.
Quote: When Abu Bakr, the Prophet’s pbuh best friend was suffering with severe pain after he gets bite by a poisonous scorpion, The Prophet pbuh put some saliva on the wound of Abu Bakr causing it to heal immediately. Read the story of the migration from Mecca to Madinah.
wow man, Jesus cured lepers, blindness, deafness and raised the dead how could he possibly compete with sucking out the venom from a scorpion bite which is only lethal in 45% of cases of people being bitten.
Quote: Is he Gods message or is he God Himself? Please stay focus…
considering FHC has answerd this question 50 billion times already i doubt answering it one more time will make much difference you obviously lack the ability of rational thought :)
Quote: and if women are raped, countries are attacked Jesus said nothing about this… just love the enemy…
if you had ever read the bible you would know how false this statment is, he would intervene but he wouldnt need to use violence.
JESUS DEALS WITH SINNERS (8:3-6)
Jesus helps people where ever and in whatever condition He finds them. He was busy teaching when He was interrupted by a group of thugs who crash in on Him. They came dragging into the room a disheveled, hastily clothed, barefooted and humiliated woman.
A woman was taken in adultery (vv. 3-4)
The scribes and Pharisees brought a woman whom they testified was caught in "the very act" of adultery (v. 4). There is no question about her guilt. John repeats the statement twice in two verses, a woman "caught in adultery." She was "taken with shame upon her." She has lived in continuous adulterous relationships so long that she is now characterized as an adulteress.
Where is the man? If I remember correctly, it takes two! Verse four says she was "caught in adultery, the very act." Should there not have been have been two sinners? Is this a lynching party? Where is the man? Who is trying to get even with the woman? Who set the deliberate trap for her? Her husband, or a former lover? Perhaps the husband set her up to divorce her or have her stoned.
This is a well-rehearsed plot to "test" Jesus with the idea of proving Him false. They were skillfully laying a trap. It was a setup.
The Pharisees demanded, "Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women; what then do You say?" (v. 5). I am sure they were ready to misquote Deuteronomy 22:22ff. They stressed stoning the woman in the recorded quotes of their conversation with Jesus, but the Law demanded that both parties be stoned. It was only under the condition of persistence after previous warning and after the actual witness of the act of adultery by two competent witnesses that a couple was to be stoned.
The Pharisees and scribes continued to press their point. They were not after the poor woman as much as they were after Jesus. They were saying this "testing" Jesus (v. 6). They wanted grounds for "accusing" Jesus. He is the one they are really after.
This self-righteous, self-appointed judge and jury were out to hang Jesus. We are determined we are going to get rid of you, one way or the other, no matter what it takes. They were filled with self–righteous hatred toward Jesus.
They kept stressing their point. "They persisted in asking Him" (v. 7a). They kept the pressure on Jesus. Come on, tell us teacher, what do You say?
As these religious leaders persisted in questioning him, Jesus stood up and invited any one among them who was sinless, not guilty of general sinfulness, to throw the first stone. By this statement they could not possibly say Jesus rejected the law. Jesus specifically enjoined them to throw the first stone. Go ahead, you are right, the Law says stone her. She is guilty. Now, you, which one of you, is sinless? Moreover, if they threw the stone they would have been guilty of breaking the Roman Law against capital punishment! Only the Roman government in Jesus' day could execute a criminal. That is why the Jewish religious leaders manipulated Pilate to execute Jesus! They didn't have the authority to execute Him.
Jesus straightened up, and said to them, "He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her" (v. 7). Then Jesus again "stooped down, and wrote on the ground" (v. 8).
the point to all this is, Jesus never needed to use violence to achieve his ends, you try to debate Muhammad was a man of peace yet you try to justify and validate his violent nature, which as i can see is so entrenched in your faith you are blind and oblivious to it if your own statments are anything to go by.
Quote: I intended not to responde to the rest of your nonsensical claims, because I believe if am going to reply, I may hurt other Christians who do not came here to attack Islam or his prophet pbuh…
umm you mean you are unable to? thats one of the wost cop out you lot have come up with to date and ive read some pretty pathetic cop outs to date.
you cant find anyway to respond or refute my claims so you strive to denigrate what i say, just like the Pharises did to Jesus, you try to lay traps with your sly toungues to denigrate the word of Jesus just like the Pharises.
christianity accepts and encorages people to question their faith as it makes them stronger in the long run, and we dont Kill, Maim and Destroy when we hear something we dont like.