01-07-2007, 05:20 AM
Did it cross your mind that maybe judges were quiting because if they didn't they were targets for murder????
-- so self interest wins out? couldn't the western forces or others protect them? is it really that futile over there? (and who were the new ones that eagerly stepped up and what were their affiliations? i'm not as stupid as you want me to be..)
..although i did learn to refrain from stupid ill-researched humorous statements (thnx to you in another thred 'round here)
when a columbian drug-lord is brought to trial the same threat of death is there for those judges, if they all ran away what is left to battle the drug-lords?
you think man? - apply this line of reasoning to the iraqi people - because they also were/are targets for murder - should they have all quit and run away? isn't this why western forces are over there? to bring a supposed 'better way' and an end to tyranny? you can't have it both ways..
How many judges were killed????
-- hey.. i don't know? a million?
Think MAN!
-- i did (i think) :P