01-06-2007, 07:25 AM
Quote:see.. i don't get it..?
if a redneck in USA was screaming 'bomb irak, bomb irak' nobody would give a sh*t (free speech) but some angry young man (27y.o) who is venting his frustration at egregious attacks on his religion by yet another western allied country is a different story?
MPs tonight described the verdict as a "sound, strong judgment".
-- gee.. what's that code for, i wonder..?
pfft ur argument is flawed, like a redneck in USA would know where or what iraq is :P
2ndly why is it ok for muslims to to make anti-christian cartoons, make slanderous comments about christianity, threaten anyone who doesnt agree with them with violence and death, yet for fear of becoming anti-islamic or Prejudiced we just roll our eyes and shake our heads and we have to keep our mouths shut, just incase some muslim might take offense and want to kill us?
yet some intellectual cripple in denmark makes a stupid cartoon and its now ok to, execute preists and nuns, bomb alot of inocent people in the name of Allah.
sometimes i think people project their dislike for Bush onto the American people making very little differential between the 2.
would be the same as someone saying they hate you because john howard is a whiney little *****
as an ademendum alot of those idiots involved on the "Cronulla" thing (talking about infedels) were charged and jailed for little more than what Umran Javed said, should their racist attitudes also be forgiven or should we show them that, that type of attitude isnt acceptable?
is it more acceptable to imprison them because there white than it is to jail Mr Javed for inciting a very real threat?