09-22-2006, 10:59 PM
Quote:interesting you only choose the footage over baghdad, and fail to mention the rest.
There's a dozen excerpts in that clip. Would make for a v. long post if I picked up on each one :D
Quote:and i saw the flares used over baghdad..there smaller, and red..and they fizzled..plus, they werent used on the first night of bombing. you dont need flares to bomb targets..you only use them for ground forces..and u wont have them on the ground when ur bombing everything lol.
Those "flares" you speak of, seem perfect hovering orbs..
1 Its a nightvision camera, and will only show hues of green, so if they are red flares it won't show.
2 Parachute flares will look almost stationary on a 10 second clip
Quote:"some ropey old fruitcake"? i tell you what, anyone and anyone other than the damn president is on the 'Discloure Project', over 400 senior staff in the US military and White House are ready to testify what they have seen is true.
And you've spoken to these 400, even just one? Just because a film, or a website states something as fact doesn't mean it is.
That 'sargent' could be anyone. For all you or I know it could be some guy they pulled off the street and slipped $20
Quote:What do u want? A damn Alien body to prove it to you?
Either that, an actual alien spaceship or a real alien radio message. I'm not fussy
These films fall into two types:
1) The out and out lie. Take stock UFO footage, drag in someone off the street and get them to claim they used to work at Roswell/Area 51, and generally make up stuff. Just take a look at that alien autopsy video as a prime example
2) Then theres the genuine UFO believer making a documentary. They take all the 'evidence', don't question any of it, and present it as proof, and if you totally switch off your brain you can believe it. Its only when you actually want to question it that you see that grainy photo of a UFO for the lampshade reflected in a window that it is.