Terrorists Suing ‘terrorists’!

[Rehmat]

In the United States, everyone, including the Jews whom you seem to have an almost insane obession with disdaining, are gauranteed equal protection under the law (4th amendment of the Constitution.) Even if these men had been guilt of terrorism, they are still entitled to a fair arrest and iterrogation process. The treatment they reportedly received was unlawful and should be investigated. Be it Muslim or Jew or anything else, the American justice system needs to guarantee rights even to the most unsavory of people in order to establish a credible and respected "dikaosyne" or "justiceness" much like the Isrealis did with the trial of Adolph Ichmann.
All terrorists, Jews and Muslims, must be brought to justice. But the claims made by these Isrealis merit investigation, and they are right in suing the Department of Justice.

Hmmmm! That’s what you think, eh!


Here is ‘a appetizer’ from a book “Open Secrets”, written by no other than an Israeli Jew – Professor Israel Shahak. And if this doesn’t show you “how equal the 2% US Jews” are with the rest of 98% US population – I would be glad to refer you to a US Christian Congressman, Paul Findely’s book “Silence no More” to show the readers how the Jewish mafia like AIPAC, ADL, and JDL control the US administration.


"territories in dispute". The Palestinians are understandably angry. But lest they be accused of anti-Semitism, they cannot, God forbid, talk about Clinton's "Jewish connection". After all, for its own purposes, the PLO wants anything as much as to keep its lines of communication with the Jewish community in the US open, because it perceives that community as so formidably powerful. Let it be recalled that Arafat chose in 1988 a delegation of American Jews as a channel to publicize his decision to recognize Israel, because he 6elieved that only via them might he gain some legitimacy for himself.' Like the rulers of Third World countries whom I mentioned earlier, Arafat seems to have firmly believed in the myth of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.


Benvenisti acknowledges that `Israel benefits from Jewish influence', but he also points to the resultant dangers: `The uncontrollability of the American Jewish establishment, together with its presumption that it represents Israeli interests "better" than Israel's elected government does, should be a matter for concern because American Jewish leaders tend to be more hawkish than the present leaders of Israel are.' Benvenisti observes that `their involvement in Israeli politics was recognized long ago as legitimate.' He also discusses their increasing financial support for the Israeli parties and movements as a manifestation of legitimacy. Even more importantly he indicates the difference between Israeli Jews and organized US Jewry: `The Jewish community in Israel is a sovereign body, its membership is determined by binding state laws and it bears full responsibility for its fate in every walk of life. US Jewry is a voluntary body, has power only over those who choose co accept its authority and even this power is limited in scope. Whoever wants to 6ear full responsibility should come and bear it here. Those who prefer to bear only a partial or marginal responsibility are free to choose so, provided they do not demand for themselves a status they do not qualify for.' It is rather curious that after defining the American Jewry as `a voluntary body', Benvenisti deplores its `uncontrollability'. But in Zionism such paradoxes abound....."


I never said that "the hacker" post under only 'one ID'


Shalom