05-31-2003, 06:47 PM
Changes in the Bible
http://www.islamcan.com
It is easy to find many passages in the Bible where Jesus is called
Son of God. One is also able to find a few passages where Jesus calls
himself the Son of God, or where he calls God his father. However, a
careful study of the Bible reveals that this is the result of changes
in the Bible. Jesus never claimed that he is the Son of God.
Each time an older manuscript of the Bible is discovered, many
changes are required in the Bible to bring it in line with the
ancient manuscripts. Mark 1:1 reads as follows:
"The beginning of the Gospel about Jesus Christ, the Son of God.b"
(Mark 1:1, New International Version).
At the end of that verse, there is a small letter directing us to
look at the footnote at the bottom of the page. There we find that
some manuscripts do not have "the Son of God." And those were
ancient, reliable manuscripts. The evidence was so compelling that
the editors of one Bible just simply removed the title Son of God
from the verse altogether. Thus in the New World Translation of the
Holy Scriptures the verse reads:
"The beginning of the good news about Jesus Christ" (Mark
1:1).
The title `Son of God' is no longer in that verse.
Another such change had to be made in the Acts of the Apostles 8:37
in every honest translation of the Bible prepared in this century.
Evidence from old manuscripts demanded that the verse be removed from
all present Bibles. If you go to your New International Version Bible
and look for Acts 8:37 you will not find it in the text. You will
find verse number 36, and then verse 38, but not 37. If you wish to
know what verse 37 used to say, you need to check the footnote at the
bottom of the page. This verse used to contain a confession that
Jesus is the Son of God. It had to be removed because its absence
from the most ancient manuscripts meant that someone added it to the
later manuscripts.[/color:c7ae04a2cc]<span>[/size:c7ae04a2cc] </span>