08-24-2004, 05:43 PM
John Doe, u seem to be another brain.
1. The sole reason of Bin Laden's jihad against America, was that the Saudi Royal Family turned down his proposal of sending his mujahidden to defeat Saddam and defend Saudi Arabia. I think this the "meeting" you are trying to say, but can't rule out.
2. Firstly its not Islamic Terrorism, its American Terrorism. Bin Laden says in the late 90s interview that he would target military personels in Saudi Arabia rather than take the fight to American soil. He did not attack Russians in Russian soil, what makes this defferent? Secondly the Jihad is a duty to Muslims as it means "Struggle For Faith". An Islamic teacher taght me that a good father to his wife and children is a Jihad. It doesnt have to be violent, it can also be feeding a starving muslim populous as an example.
3. It has to be an Islamic Rule for the Muslims. I dont know about the west, but in Islam it has to be under the Shariah. I DONT MEAN THE CORRUPT SAUDIS.
4. The most propaganda figuere of Saddam's killings is 300k, we will stick to it, compare it to Americas killings of 1.5 million Iraqis, i guess i would stick with Saddam, the least amount of people he killed in terms of civil deaths are 6000 people. What would u choose the 300k quick deaths, or the 1.5 million slow deaths in which a father can only see his child deteriot to death in a very slow process, due to lack of food and medicines.