Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The oneness of Allah accoridng to Bukhari
#1

Salam all


I did not know that I am a member here actually, however I received a PM today informing me of a reply to a thread that I participated in, in the past, so I will take the chance and show you in a serious of comments, how the man made books of hadith are silly enough to be dismissed.


We all know what the oneness of Allah means, a child should even know that, simply, Allah is One, there no god but Him, HOW SIMPLE?


Well, let's see how mister Bukhari explains to us the oneness of Allah:


Mister Bukhari elaborated on the oneness of Allah in a hadith under a chapter in his Sahih that he named <b>التوحيد </b>, <b>Al-Tawhid</b> , let’s have a look:


http://hadith.al-islam.com/Display/Display...=6930&doc=0


[Image: bukhari_6930.jpg]


Hmm what was that exactly dear Muslim brothers and sisters?


Well, the above hadith is not a saying or an action of Mohammed, rather an alleged saying and action by Aysha


Aysha is telling us through Bukhari that she never was jealous of any woman except Khadijah, then she ended her hadith by saying that His Lord (the Lord of Mohammed) commanded him to inform her (Khadijah) that she will have a house in Paradise.


Hold on a minute, was that suppose to be the oneness of Allah?


It seems that mister Bikhari was so confused that he listed absolutely non sense under a chapter that he named Al-Tawhid, what is more revolting, that the above hadith suppose to explain to us the Quran words <b>قول الله تعالى ولا تنفع الشفاعة عنده إلا لمن أذن </b>, i.e. <b>intercession will not be allowed except to those who will be permitted</b> as in the Quran verse: <b> 20:109 يومئذ لا تنفع الشفاعة الا من اذن له الرحمن ورضي له قولا </b>


Now I am asking mister Bukhari and all his followers, how the jealousy of Aysha towards Kahdijah is explaining to us verse 20:109 that <b> لا تنفع الشفاعة الا من اذن له الرحمن ورضي له قولا</b>, i.e. <b> intercession will not be allowed except to those who will be permitted </b>?


Well, how about this question, how the jealousy of Aysha towards Kahdijah is explaining to us the oneness of Allah?


I guess no one will be able to answer those two simple questions, which should lead to the final survey:


Who is the confused one:


1) Bukhari


2) His followers


3) All the above


I guess you should know the answer by now


Salam

Reply
#2

<b>Did Bukhari disobey the Prophet?</b>



Salam all


In today’s Bukhari Sunnah lesson, we will look at another strange hadith alleged by Bukhari which should convict him and many others of the crime of, not obeying the prophet.


http://hadith.al-islam.com/Display/Display...m=126&doc=0


[Image: Bukhari_126.jpg]


The above hadith by Bukhari is listed under a sub-chapter that he named: <b> من خص بالعلم قوما دون قوم كراهية أن لا يفهموا </b>, i.e. <b> The one who exclusively transfer knowledge to some but not others, fearing that the others may not understand the knowledge)</b>, which is under a chapter that he named: <b> العلم </b>, i.e. <b> The Knowledge</b>


The message of the above hadith is non sensible though, it is alleged that Anas Ibn Malik said that it was mentioned to him the following:


<i>The prophet said to Maaz Ibn Jabal: Whoever meets Allah while not shirking anything with Him, he should enter paradise.</i>


So Maaz Ibn Jabal said to the prophet:


<i>Should I inform everyone so they the receive the good tidings?</i>


The prophet replied back:


<i>NO, as I fear that they may rely on that.</i>


End of hadith


Well, can you see that Anas Ibn Malik did not tell us who told him that? He only said that it was mentioned to him. How Bukhari then managed to authenticate such allegation? This is not really important, I actually careless about any Isnad or chain of narrators, all I care about is the logic behind the message in such allegation, that is if there is any.


The logic of the above allegation is obvious, Bukhari is telling us that some people may be informed with vital and crucial information in the religion, while others should never be informed likewise, the reason given by Bukhari is, those who will be excluded from knowing such information, have been excluded because of fear that they may rely on it totally by misunderstanding the information.


The vital information in the above allegation, is simply: Anyone who meets Allah while not shirking with Him anything, will go to paradise.


According to the allegation, the prophet said so to one person only, such person is named Maaz Ibn Jabal, obviously Maaz rejoiced when he heard such crucial information, so when he wanted to say it to everyone, the prophet clearly <b>PROHIBITED HIM</b> from doing so, by telling him <b>NO</b>, as well explaining his reason to why the information should be concealed from some people, which is the fear that those people misunderstand the message and totally rely on it without working hard on their deeds beside their Iman (belief).


Now I wonder, who should deserve to know such crucial information and who should not? I mean who can judge that? Certainly the prophet could have judged it and said it to Maaz Ibn Jabal, knowing that Maaz will not rely on that alone. Now, what do you think is the benefit of such message to the people like Maaz? Absolutely nothing, the danger of such message is certainly outweighing the 0 benefit it has.


Allah already told us at least a couple of times in the Quran that He may forgive all sins except Shirk, therefore there is nothing that is new in the above allegation, on the other hand, Maaz Ibn Jabal certainly did not conceal it from some people, he must have said it to a few, and from those few it spread to more people, until it reached Bukhari, so mister Bukhari in his total recklessness disobeyed the prophet and documented it in a book so every Muslim from his time onwards knows about it. HOW SILLY.


Let’s just assume that Maaz obeyed the prophet and only said such information to a few and concealed it from the rest, as he was commanded by the prophet. Now, those few started to spread it to other few(s), possibly all those people may be excused assuming that the people thought of those to whom they said it, will not rely on it. However mister Bukhari came and put the final nail in the coffin by informing every single Muslim in the world spanning over generations and generations for 1200 years with such allegation, IN CLEAR VIOLATION TO THE PROPHET COMMAND IN THE SAME AND VERY ALLEGATION IN BUKHARI”S SAHIH BOOK.


Simply, Bukhari convicted his own self, he proved how confused and disobedient to the prophet commands, he was, and certainly millions and millions of Muslims now totally rely on that, i.e. if they meet Allah without shirking anything with Him, they will go to paradise while totally ignoring the issue of their deeds.


See, it is not about the belief only, it is always about the belief and deeds, a fact that is mentioned in the Quran tens of times, yet mister Bukhari totally ignored such fact, in addition to his clear disobedience to the prophet's command of not saying it to everyone rather a few.


Salam

Reply
#3

Witness of this Hadith the Word of Aisha .. (Allah order him to inform her (Khadijah) that she will have a house in Paradise.)


This means


Mohammed (pbuh) does not give a house in Paradise without Allah's authorized.


Example:


If I was your boss at work , and I told you to tell your colleague Ahmed (I'll reward him.)


You went to your colleague Mahmoud , And you said to Mahmoud :


I feel jealous towards Ahmad and the Director told me that offset.


Some people believed that Muhammad (Pbuh) can heal the sick, respond to prayer, Muhammad can not do things like this , only Allah . This is not Islam .


For this reason, Aisha said :


His Lord commanded him to inform her that she will have a house in Paradise.


And For this reason, al-Bukhaari included this hadeeth in the belief section


Now who is confused ?


1-Shi'ites


2-Qranion


3-Ahmed Bahgat


4-All


Please be quiet :)

Reply
#4

Bismillah


as salam alykom Ahmadbahgat,


I m quite surprised that u forgot you were a member here, and even more surprised and sorry that u ended up sooo confused. Dont u even mention assalatu a`la rasullah? or u just forgot.


Jazakum Alah khairan hassan for this explanation, the point is soooo clear even a child would see it. May Allah Grant us insight ameen.

Reply
#5

Bismillah


Ahmadbahgat, I merged both topics and I will apprecite it if u post all of your desired lessons under this thread. This will allow the reader better understanding as well as maintain a main theme. Shukran.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)