Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are the 70,000 Pentagon Mercs in Iraq killing Shias, Sunnis?
#1

http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/re...ervice_ID=12592


The kidnapping of four American security contractors earlier this month in Iraq revived allegations that U.S. private security companies are involved in the current bloodshed in Iraq. Iraq war is not just fought by occupation armies and resistance fighters- private firms, consisting of gun-wielding ex-soldiers, are also involved.


Could some of the Pentagon’s hired Mercenaries be the real perpetrators of the daily bombings and assassinations of Sunnis and Shias in Iraq?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQMsBDQj2U...related&search=


Is the current disaster taking place in the war-torn country part of a wider plot to provoke a U.S./Israeli planned civil war that will dismember Iraq?


That is what’s being said in Young Pelton’s upcoming book “Licensed To Kill: Hired Guns in the War on Terror”


Pelton, a journalist, filmmaker, and explorer who authored The World's Most Dangerous Places, Come Back Alive, The Adventurist, and Three Worlds Gone Mad, suggests that there are more than 70,000 armed men working as security contractors in Iraq to back the U.S. military as the U.S. begins to draw down troops.


What backs Pelton’s revelations and shocking facts he discovered about the world of military contractors is what Nick Bicanic and Jason Bourque uncover in their “Shadow Company” documentary that unveils the origins and destinations of these modern-day guns for hire.


Who are these security contractors? What do they do? Why do they do it? Bicanic’s documentary answers these questions.


Shadow Company highlights the danger of allowing profit-motivated firms to get into the business of war.


Those individuals, those modern-day mercenaries, are changing the face of modern warfare while their world has remained mystery to those at home.


The U.S. believes in using private sector in all facets of its so-called "War on Terror"; resorting to contractors to back its military, giving them a license to kill- their services available to the highest bidder.

Reply
#2

Remeber this story?


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/septe...tagedterror.htm

Reply
#3

http://news.independent.co.uk/world...ticle360624.ece


By Robert Fisk - 28 April 2006


In Syria, the world appears through a glass, darkly. As dark as the smoked windows of the car which takes me to a building on the western side of Damascus where a man I have known for 15 years - we shall call him a "security source", which is the name given by American correspondents to their own powerful intelligence officers - waits with his own ferocious narrative of disaster in Iraq and dangers in the Middle East.


His is a fearful portrait of an America trapped in the bloody sands of Iraq, desperately trying to provoke a civil war around Baghdad in order to reduce its own military casualties. It is a scenario in which Saddam Hussein remains Washington's best friend, in which Syria has struck at the Iraqi insurgents with a ruthlessness that the United States wilfully ignores. And in which Syria's Interior Minister, found shot dead in his office last year, committed suicide because of his own mental instability.


The Americans, my interlocutor suspected, are trying to provoke an Iraqi civil war so that Sunni Muslim insurgents spend their energies killing their Shia co-religionists rather than soldiers of the Western occupation forces. "I swear to you that we have very good information," my source says, finger stabbing the air in front of him. <b>"One young Iraqi man told us that he was trained by the Americans as a policeman in Baghdad and he spent 70 per cent of his time learning to drive and 30 per cent in weapons training. They said to him: 'Come back in a week.' When he went back, they gave him a mobile phone and told him to drive into a crowded area near a mosque and phone them. He waited in the car but couldn't get the right mobile signal. So he got out of the car to where he received a better signal. Then his car blew up."</b>


Impossible, I think to myself. But then I remember how many times Iraqis in Baghdad have told me similar stories. These reports are believed even if they seem unbelievable. And I know where much of the Syrian information is gleaned: from the tens of thousands of Shia Muslim pilgrims who come to pray at the Sayda Zeinab mosque outside Damascus. These men and women come from the slums of Baghdad, Hillah and Iskandariyah as well as the cities of Najaf and Basra. Sunnis from Fallujah and Ramadi also visit Damascus to see friends and relatives and talk freely of American tactics in Iraq.


<b>"There was another man, trained by the Americans for the police. He too was given a mobile and told to drive to an area where there was a crowd - maybe a protest - and to call them and tell them what was happening. Again, his new mobile was not working. So he went to a landline phone and called the Americans and told them: 'Here I am, in the place you sent me and I can tell you what's happening here.' And at that moment there was a big explosion in his car."</b>


Just who these "Americans" might be, my source did not say. In the anarchic and panic-stricken world of Iraq, there are many US groups - including countless outfits supposedly working for the American military and the new Western-backed Iraqi Interior Ministry - who operate outside any laws or rules. No one can account for the murder of 191 university teachers and professors since the 2003 invasion - nor the fact that more than 50 former Iraqi fighter-bomber pilots who attacked Iran in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war have been assassinated in their home towns in Iraq in the past three years.


Amid this chaos, a colleague of my source asked me, how could Syria be expected to lessen the number of attacks on Americans inside Iraq? "It was never safe, our border," he said. "During Saddam's time, criminals and Saddam's terrorists crossed our borders to attack our government. I built a wall of earth and sand along the border at that time. But three car bombs from Saddam's agents exploded in Damascus and Tartous- I was the one who captured the criminals responsible. But we couldn't stop them."


Now, he told me, the rampart running for hundreds of miles along Syria's border with Iraq had been heightened. "I have had barbed wire put on top and up to now we have caught 1,500 non-Syrian and non-Iraqi Arabs trying to cross and we have stopped 2,700 Syrians from crossing ... Our army is there - but the Iraqi army and the Americans are not there on the other side."


Behind these grave suspicions in Damascus lies the memory of Saddam's long friendship with the United States. "Our Hafez el-Assad [the former Syrian president who died in 2000] learnt that Saddam, in his early days, met with American officials 20 times in four weeks. This convinced Assad that, in his words, 'Saddam is with the Americans'. Saddam was the biggest helper of the Americans in the Middle East (when he attacked Iran in 1980) after the fall of the Shah. And he still is! After all, he brought the Americans to Iraq!"


So I turn to a story which is more distressing for my sources: the death by shooting of Brigadier General Ghazi Kenaan, former head of Syrian military intelligence in Lebanon - an awesomely powerful position - and Syrian Minister of Interior when his suicide was announced by the Damascus government last year.


Widespread rumours outside Syria suggested that Kenaan was suspected by UN investigators of involvement in the murder of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri in a massive car bomb in Beirut last year - and that he had been "suicided" by Syrian government agents to prevent him telling the truth.


Not so, insisted my original interlocutor. "General Ghazi was a man who believed he could give orders and anything he wanted would happen. Something happened that he could not reconcile - something that made him realise he was not all-powerful. On the day of his death, he went to his office at the Interior Ministry and then he left and went home for half an hour. Then he came back with a pistol. He left a message for his wife in which he said goodbye to her and asked her to look after their children and he said that what he was going to do was 'for the good of Syria'. Then he shot himself in the mouth."


Of Hariri's assassination, Syrian officials like to recall his relationship with the former Iraqi interim prime minister Iyad Alawi - a self-confessed former agent for the CIA and MI6 - and an alleged $20bn arms deal between the Russians and Saudi Arabia in which they claim Hariri was involved.


Hariri's Lebanese supporters continue to dismiss the Syrian argument on the grounds that Syria had identified Hariri as the joint author with his friend, French President Jacques Chirac, of the UN Security Council resolution which demanded the retreat of the Syrians from Lebanese territory.


But if the Syrians are understandably obsessed with the American occupation of Iraq, their long hatred for Saddam - something which they shared with most Iraqis - is still intact. When I asked my first "security" source what would happen to the former Iraqi dictator, he replied, banging his fist into his hand: "He will be killed. He will be killed. He will be killed."

Reply
#4

I’ve noticed that Fisk is the darling of Islamists as his agenda is clearly designed with a Western hating edge.



He certainly is partisan, and I don't think he pretends to be any different, although he seems to have disliked Arafat as much as he does Sharon.


He’s not just partisan. He’s biased <i>in extremis</i> and his every utterance is couched in terms of pressing a personal agenda. I don’t see it as important whether he likes or dislikes one entity more or less than another. If he chooses to write opinion pieces, that’s his choosing. However, don’t make the mistake that his opinions are not fostered under the umbrella of a bias and a bigotry firmly in place. His prejudices and preconceptions have earned him ridicule and condemnation from his peers. That is probably the greatest indictment against him and the foul odor he has cast upon his craft.


My experience with reading his “work” is that he doesn’t interview people, he "quotes" them, maybe sometimes in context, maybe not. I'm not there - I don't know if he has invented quotes or not. There's no way to tell. However, given his obvious deep hatred for America and Israel would you suggest you have never been concerned about the accuracy of his "quotes"


An interview, even a sound bite interview, with a civilian needs some, however minimal, background for credibility. It makes big difference.


for example:- (this is a Fisk “quote”)


"If I was an Iraqi and I read that," an Arab woman shouted at me, "I would become a suicide bomber."


http://www.rense.com/general37/colon.htm


An "Arab women" shouting that "quote" - Maybe there was an "Arab woman", maybe not - but until we know something about her, her quote (if it was ever uttered) means nothing other than Bobby Fisk hates Israel, America and Great Britain -- probably in that order. This is typical of the “quotes” that Fisk attributes to people, people we don’t know by name, people we can’t identify with, nameless people who Fisk feels free to “quote”.


This is my favorite (and one of the few times we know the identity of the person or persons Fisk is talking to) – just after the end of Gulf2, and remember the context of that moment in recent history:


I met – extraordinarily – an Iraqi nuclear scientist walking around the compound, a colleague of the former head of Iraqi nuclear physics, Dr Sharistani. "This is the last place I ever wanted to see and I will never return to it," he said to me. "This was the place of greatest evil in all the world."


Did anyone catch that? That's it? - no talking to this guy?, no questions or comments? Unbelievable!! Either:


1) Fisk is stupendously stupid;,


2) this encounter never happened, or


3) Fisk takes it for granted his readers are blithering idiots.


Would any real journalist pass up an interview with a close colleague of senior members of Iraq’s nuke program, for the first time free to talk? It's Pulitzer stuff if you get it right.


Fisk..he chucks in a quote and moves on looking for more fertile hunting grounds for his views..maybe a group of youths over there will provide the anti-US quotes he wants?...sod the reality...the Fisking must be consistent...and what greater consistency - "The USA is WRONG" - every time, every circumstance.

Reply
#5

Quote:I like Fisk but there is something amiss in this conspiracy.


<i>But then I remember how many times Iraqis in Baghdad have told me similar stories.</i>


If this is happening so frequently and so many people seem to know about it, don't you think people would stop falling for the same old trick ? Sounds more like an urban legend than a fact. I think Fisk has lost it.

Do you like Fisk because he has lost it?


The question you pose reflects some ignorance! People in the ME may know but people in the west do not as it is not reported on majority of the state-owned media in the west which majority of people fall for.


Fisk must be anti-west, unpatriotic etc. etc. if he exposes the west's dirty tactics...TYPICAL! But this issue is not about Fisk, it is rather about the deceptive means which the west uses to achieve its aims i.e. terror tactics in this case. Also, these tactics have been reported before but not made it on your televisions etc.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)