+- Forums (https://bb.islamsms.com)
+-- Forum: ENGLISH (https://bb.islamsms.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Current Affairs (https://bb.islamsms.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: THE U.S. PUSHED U.N. REFORMS VIA BLACKMAIL & DECEI (/showthread.php?tid=7728)
THE U.S. PUSHED U.N. REFORMS VIA BLACKMAIL & DECEI - stanley - 04-28-2005
THE U.S. PUSHED U.N. REFORMS VIA BLACKMAIL & DECEIT
www.voiceofummah.net – Voice of Ummah
24/4/05
by Ahmed Abdul Kareem al Nabulsi
America's final push for the U.N. to represent the New World Order
Kofi Annan's 63 page proposal to introduce a host of sweeping reforms to the United Nations on March 21st 2005, is the culmination of decades of planning and strategic manoeuvring alongside dirty Mafioso tactics by the United States of America. The primary objective of these insidiously U.S. pushed reforms is to eradicate any remaining presence Europe has within the international situation. Epitomising the American ideal, Bush's current nomination for U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, boldly stated back in 1994: 'that there is no such thing as the United Nations and that here is an international community that occasionally can only be led by the only real power left in the world and that is the United States.' Thus America views her role and that of the former 'great' powers of Europe, Russia and China in the New World Order clearly – America leads and dictates while the rest of the "world including Europe" must follow.
The Entrapment of the Security General
The final status in the achievement of this objective is now approaching after a year of intense American instigated pressure upon the United Nations. The exposing of the fraudulent Iraqi oil-for-food program, sex abuse by peacekeepers in Congo as well as the verbal attacks of 'ineptness' and 'irrelevance' were accompanied with the U.S.' audacious questioning of the need for the U.N. to exist. Just recently on April 16th 2005, Condoleeza Rice stated, "The United Nations cannot survive if it doesn't reform". Incredibly what many have seemingly forgotten is that all of these scandals were enacted or overlooked under the auspices of America. Even the Secretary General was personally vilified by the exposure of his son’s links to the oil-for-food scandal. Ironically while the world called for Annan’s resignation, it was America that continued to support him. Thus sending a clear message to the Secretary General the extent to which his career was dependent upon the U.S. Consequently it was not long after, that Kofi Annan announced his proposal for reforms, which when scrutinised carefully are in direct accordance with the United States’ vision and plan to consolidate its international hegemony for the forthcoming decades.
Kofi Annan’s entrapment and predicament is a style often used by the United States as it has mastered how to monopolise on the debauched nature of Capitalism. Numerous incidents have showcased how the United States traps individuals via bribery and clandestine incentives which in turn are later used to blackmail them to activities within American interests. For example the 'Israelis' with Omri Sharon (son of Ariel) and Benjamin Netanyahu are just a few of the individuals who have suffered from accepting American instigated kickbacks which have come back to haunt them and their political aspirations. Hence when Kofi Annan submitted comprehensively to the American will of proposing reforms, he still couldn't contain some of his frustration while at the same time indicate how the United States themselves were fully behind the oil for food scandals. On 15th April 2005, Annan stated, “They (America & Britain) were the ones who had interdiction, possibly they were also the ones who knew exactly what was going on, and the countries themselves decided to close their eyes to smuggling..”
Removing the Veto & Consolidating U.S. dominance
As for the many proposals that are in line with American interests the following is the most fundamental i.e. The removal of veto power from the Security Council's permanent members (the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France) alongside an expanded, more representative Security Council. Since the United Nations rejected the 1952 U.S. proposal for the right to veto to be removed, the Americans made persistent attempts to portray the veto as ineffective and a regular cause of stagnation. By cleverly utilising its own veto to consistently stall any international initiations made by the Europeans, the United States successfully managed to marginalise the Security Council and in turn the role of the European states. Furthermore the U.S. has endeavoured to show the world via its recent unilateral decisions, that the right to veto status, which puts the permanent members on a par with America, is no longer befitting of the reality. Therefore with the inevitable removal of the right to veto, the so called 'World War II Allies' will be reduced to being on equal terms with nations such as Brazil, India and Australia. This would consequently further reduce what international clout they have left while simultaneously consolidating America's domination of the International situation. It is this American vision that Kofi Annan referred to when claiming "a change in the Council's composition is needed to make it more broadly representative of the international community as a whole, as well as of the geopolitical realities of today, and thereby more legitimate in the eyes of the world".
It is also evident that the proposal to expand the Security Council will eventually evolve into more U.N. decisions being made by a majority vote from the General Assembly. This would provide the United States with unsurpassed control of the U.N. with the majority of General Assembly members being loyal or affiliated to American interests. This agenda was best summarized by 'Captain Africa' himself, American lickspittle Muammar al-Qathafi when he stated on 11th April 2005, "genuine reform in the UN, (that) can only be achieved through democracy in this international body, which requires shifting Security Council powers to the General Assembly, in which all world countries enjoy permanent and equal membership". Even the Security Council itself has been targeted for including nations which were once colonized by the 'Allies', thus placing them on an equivalent with their former demeaned colonial masters. As Annan clearly mentioned in his report, "..bring into the decision-making process countries more representative of the broader membership, especially of the developing world….. They should increase the democratic and accountable nature of the body"
U.S. encourages China & Russia's economies & diminishes their international aspirations.
While the former European Allies may be the primary target of America and her initiated U.N. reforms, it is also evident that China will also be severely affected. Through the eventual accession of India and Japan into the Security Council, America will succeed in diminishing the role and status of China within the Asian region. By removing the right to veto, China will soon be considered no different internationally to its Asian counterparts. Even the American fabricated North Korean missile crisis has served its purpose of inflating the tiny communist nation's significance on a par with China. This was achieved by making North Korea a focus of American foreign policy, consequently giving it precedence over other vital issues within the region especially those concerning China e.g. the unification with Taiwan. Moreover America's tenacious attempts to establish stable trade relations between the once warring Asian nations is aimed at building China into a powerful economic bloc while simultaneously removing any future aspirations the Chinese may have in influencing the International situation or the Asian region. China's accession into the W.T.O. as well as the numerous oil deals provided by the U.S. (Sudan being an example) is ample evidence for this ominous ploy.
As for Russia her current aspirations have also been confined to merely building herself into an economic bloc. With the United States slowly usurping influence from Russia over the former Soviet states e.g. Ukraine and Georgia, Russia is helplessly being pushed towards having to establish stronger economic ties with Europe. A vivid example is the recent gas deal between Germany's BASF and Russia's Gazprom which incorporates a 1’187-kilometer gas pipeline that will deliberately bypass Ukraine and Belarus despite more than 90 per cent of Russia’s current natural gas exports going through these two ex-Soviet countries. In order to safeguard her own economic interests, Russia will inevitably have to build further economic ties with Europe as she continues to be isolated by her former Soviet states that are now affiliating themselves with the U.S. Therefore the forthcoming U.N. reforms and subsequent removal of the right to veto will only further enhance Russia's rapid decline into being deemed as just another European state.
Just this week Kofi Annan again reiterated his push for reforms when he stated," The Security Council should be broadly representative of the realities of power in today's world". The reality of power in the world today is that the United States of America is aiming to create a Capitalist Empire in which she is the sole governor. The former 'great powers' are expected to watch, follow and pick up the crumbs of America's imperialist leftovers. So far, that is exactly what they have been doing.
www.sawtalummah.com - صوت الأمة
www.idraak.com - الإدراك
www.islamvkufr.com – The Islam vs Kufr website
THE U.S. PUSHED U.N. REFORMS VIA BLACKMAIL & DECEI - Muslimah - 04-28-2005
Bismillah
as salam alykom
I think this is just a normal development of the situation
Allah u lmost`an